You're just using semantic sleight-of-hand to facilitate an invasion.

dont post the fun stuff

dude ur the one using a semantic sleight of habnd

I have a shitposting account but it's not on facebook

im jsut using the most common definition

and askign you to be more specific, less hyperbolic

my meme account isn't on a major social media platform, which is why I'm not worried about it being found

Rushing the border is an attack, there's no need to consult the dictionary.

so not to spread propagandistic opinions

bitch

theyd be dead if it was a real attack

theyre just intentionally breaking the law

They should be dead.

BREAKING THE LAWWWWWW

lol

good luck

Build wall, put illegals on the other side of it.

trying to convice anyone youre correct

Build wall, catapult illegals back over it.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/invasion
Second definition

im aware

shoot them 😛

hes jsut acting like its an armed invasion

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/invading

stand your ground

No he just said invasion

even though i know hes not

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAq4WHFzvpY

I don't need to convince anybody that we're being invaded by illegals. The facts already confirm that.

You can argue that it's a misleading term, that's fine

But it's not technically incorrect

but all his solutions and reactions are the reasonable responses to a violent invasion

Not really

IE extremely unrealistic for the way hes using it

>yeah kill everyone trying to come over

>not unreasonable

Law stated in... Can't remember if it was Denmark or Sweden, maybe both
If you caught people crossing the ice you shot them

Pretty sure that's not still on the books

There's nothing at all unrealistic about protecting a national border with deadly force.

But it's not like there isn't a precedent

my concern really didn't get answered but I guess I didn't make it clear. What should I do if the bias response team or something comes for me because of a meme I posted?