Message from @Jerm70

Discord ID: 686544253811294209


2020-03-09 07:30:14 UTC  

As well.

2020-03-09 07:30:29 UTC  

You mean the worldwide pedophile rings?

2020-03-09 07:30:46 UTC  

No. I mean Climate something.

2020-03-09 07:31:01 UTC  

Ah that hoax

2020-03-09 07:31:02 UTC  

Global Warming Cooling Climate Change thing.

2020-03-09 07:31:18 UTC  

This is the thing

2020-03-09 07:31:29 UTC  

The climate is for all intents and purpose changing.

2020-03-09 07:31:44 UTC  

I don't see any reasons to assume its not just the natural trend.

2020-03-09 07:32:04 UTC  

And at the very worst case scenario, we are merely accelerating the process.

2020-03-09 07:39:19 UTC  

So then tf are you going on about

2020-03-09 07:50:34 UTC  

Just anthropomorphic climate change denial, nothing new

2020-03-09 08:29:59 UTC  

@the1j you will die

2020-03-09 08:30:53 UTC  

What a crazy fact there

2020-03-09 08:50:49 UTC  

i agree with jerm, australia for example has been on a 100 year cycle of crippling drought and flooding rain for as long as humans have existed on the continent (which scholars suggest is anywhere form 40-80 thousand years) nothing has changed, we've just entered the flood cycle which should last for 2-8 years and then we will enter another drought cycle which can last from 4-12 years

2020-03-09 10:11:46 UTC  

Shocking. @honkhonk

2020-03-09 11:55:35 UTC  

@PoisonTaco
@Jerm70
It's "covid"
Corvids are bluejays, ravens, etc.

2020-03-09 12:00:19 UTC  

Well I want to know the study that proves what causes the climate changes we can see.

2020-03-09 12:01:14 UTC  

It is just accepted that this is the case because it couldn't be natural.

2020-03-09 12:01:33 UTC  

Obviously.

2020-03-09 12:01:45 UTC  

*Puts on thick glasses*

2020-03-09 12:02:08 UTC  

Because global cooling was a real threat.

2020-03-09 12:02:10 UTC  

Oh wait.

2020-03-09 12:02:29 UTC  

We aren't allow to talk about that.

2020-03-09 12:02:43 UTC  

Otherwise we are climate change deniers.

2020-03-09 12:15:00 UTC  

well the best accessible source is that nasa data, its on their official website (I really hope this doesnt go the "nasa is lying" route lol)

2020-03-09 12:17:19 UTC  

here's a link to the page: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/ (it has links to other relavent sea data, global temp and other data from that page) @Jerm70 also here's a link to a report Shell did (Exxon did a similar one) in 1988 which we only know exists because it got leaked, basically they came to the conclusion that anthropomoprhic climate change existed but they hid the file: http://www.climatefiles.com/shell/1988-shell-report-greenhouse/

2020-03-09 12:19:04 UTC  

Bernie fucked again <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/622430408377630761/686548608006488066/Screenshot_20200309-121829_Chrome.jpg

2020-03-09 12:20:37 UTC  

Serious Q... do global warming alarmists genuinely believe the world is ending in 11-12 yrs? We've had this drum being beaten for over 2-3 decades now...

2020-03-09 12:20:48 UTC  

and before that it was global freezing

2020-03-09 12:21:39 UTC  

being alarmist is dumb, but denying science is dumber

2020-03-09 12:23:12 UTC  

Guys Gabbard will get the nomination

2020-03-09 12:23:34 UTC  

Dont worry, More dick sucking will do the trick

2020-03-09 12:23:40 UTC  

And if only there was a period in geological history that showed global warming and cooling predated the industrial period and carbon production of man... oh wait
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150528083818.htm
https://www.britannica.com/science/Jurassic-Period/Paleoclimate
To put things into perspective, the current avg world temps is 60.9F. It was 68F back then. Life on the planet did not go extinct.

2020-03-09 12:23:45 UTC  

but to fully answer your question, as far as we can tell we arn't gonna go extinct from climate change, but its consequences will have negative impacts on us @TheGhostAgent

2020-03-09 12:25:13 UTC  

also you do realise that that event caused a mass extinction right? @TheGhostAgent

2020-03-09 12:25:35 UTC  

The ice age event?

2020-03-09 12:26:13 UTC  

There's a lot of events on the planet that created mass extinctions, so which 1 are you referring to?

2020-03-09 12:27:25 UTC  

Because in the link I provided, it referred to a global cooling/cold snap -
***"To be capable of better assessing the current human-made climate change, we must, for example, understand what processes in an extreme greenhouse climate contribute significantly to climate change." In the case of the Cretaceous cold snap, Herrle assumes that due to the opening of the Atlantic in conjunction with changes in oceanic circulation and marine productivity, more carbon was incorporated into the sediments. This resulted in a decrease in the carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere, which in turn produced global cooling.

The Frankfurt scientist's newly acquired data from the Cretaceous period will now be correlated with results for this era derived from the Atlantic, "in order to achieve a more accurate stratigraphic classification of the Cretaceous period and to better understand the interrelationships between the polar regions and the subtropics," is the outlook Herrle provides."***

2020-03-09 12:33:51 UTC  

okay, i didn't realise that you were talking about a cold snap, thought you were generically going to be talking about the warming at the Cretaceous, Jurassic period boundary time

2020-03-09 12:35:14 UTC  

but I think the cold snap is besides the point, the link between C02 and warming is pretty well established and if there is process that can reverse it great! but this isn't really a point against anthropomorphic climate change