Anybody who uses natsoc unironically is just not very smart. No politician will be able to proclaim they are a national socialist even if they hold some nationalist ideas and a few socialist ideas. They will always have to rebrand it in a new way. Tucker has said that he is against a lot of the things that primarily benefit the elites in this country. He rails on h1-b visas for example. To some degree he does represent the average middle-class worker in America. Tucker does speak to the workers more broadly in America. Restricting what these elites can do, and not deferring to just muh economic freedom, muh liberty. Is a somewhat socialist idea. The idea that we have a society that is connected together that to some degree has to be maintained.
The elite class wants the h1-b visas on both the democrat and republican side. But because tucker knows that it will primarily damage the average American worker he is against these visa programs. This is only one of many examples.
Now would Tucker ever say that this has some socialistic ideas embedded in it? Well not really. He would frame it in a nationalist perspective by saying that opposing these visas is an America First policy, he wouldnt say its a socialist policy.
