Message from @DrWittMDPhD
Discord ID: 504167947162615810
But @DrWittMDPhD Does have a point, the DOD did a study on how sucessful it would be for the US military to literally fight against its own civilians, they said it would be vastly unfeasable. Alot of soldiers will abandon the military immediately
I'd say most, not just a lot
and all their supplies and deports would be destroyed/cut-off
No, I am talking about the case of there being the unity of 150m people.
depots*
If there was that level of unity among the population, the point would be moot.
Just decide to not pick up the trash in cities for a month.
That alone would bring the nation to a standstill.
It would be fuckin Robespierre guillotine time before marshal law. K, a hostile government could easily unify a resistance of at least half the population
Refuse to operate any public transport in New York.
Not 150m armed militia men, but real resistance members
Not like lefty gays
Yes, but that's the point I am making.
With that level of unity, violence is unnecessary.
Passive resistance on that scale can bring anything to a standstill.
Yeah and 150m would not be that hard if the government tries to use our military to enforce some fascistic marshal law. That's so anti American it's insane to think about and we'd freak the fuck out
We're not cucked continentals
But, the sad part is that government abuse can continue for a very long time and people will not coordinate.
Maybe that is different now with the internet.
The Gulag Archipelago detailed this well.
The army of the Soviet Union was incredibly weak for years before that fall.
If people had formed militias, it could have ended far sooner, but they were taken away one by one.
They still believed in the cause, some even when they were already in the Gulag.
Every productive person in Sweden could just decide to stop paying taxes and the migrant crises would end within a month.
The thing is, people are divided against each other, so they get states that abuse the ones who are most compliant.
The migrant crisis isn't as bad as the Swedish government using it's military to strike it's own people. You keep changing the scenario.
Also, Sweden isn't America
No, it's actually a very similar scenario.
I see there being one thread in all of this.
Bad policy harming a country is not the same as military force on one's own populace.
I see it all as the abuse of dysfunctional states that no longer serve their people but are there to abuse them.
Yes there can be a theme in there that's the same, but the scale is so much different
The issue with the modern state is that they have become a purpose onto their own end and perpetration.
The scale? Sure it's different for countries of different sizes.
Stop right there
I'm not talking about scale of US v Sweden
But the types of abuses, the kinds of laws that are being enacted all over the place are very similar.
I said the situation of migrants and military occupation
I don't see it as very differen,t because it's not the root cause of their issues.
Nobody wanted the EU super state.