Message from @notaglobe

Discord ID: 689510894173945910


2020-03-17 15:45:26 UTC  

paid for by you

2020-03-17 15:45:45 UTC  

Using your thought direction, the only thing I would change would be to improve the court system to ensure civil cases can be brought cheaply, or that arbitration is available

2020-03-17 15:47:48 UTC  

And for the record, I wouldn't oppose nationalising BTOpenreach on ideological grounds since it's a monolithic piece of infrastructure

2020-03-17 15:47:52 UTC  

I just don't think it'd solve anything

2020-03-17 15:49:49 UTC  

There's a minimum 8 weeks needed between reporting a fault, and it being eligible to take to arbitration and that's about 4 weeks longer than it needs to be

2020-03-17 16:10:17 UTC  

yknow if the gov wanted to nationalise railways, this would be the best time.... when its at its cheapest

2020-03-17 16:10:30 UTC  

close them down

2020-03-17 16:10:35 UTC  

only parasites rely on railways

2020-03-17 16:13:49 UTC  

nah railways are cool

2020-03-17 16:16:49 UTC  

stop subisidies for them

2020-03-17 16:16:55 UTC  

i'll be content then

2020-03-17 16:20:22 UTC  

I quite like the subsidies too

2020-03-17 16:20:37 UTC  

Theyre expensive enough with them let alone without them

2020-03-17 16:23:38 UTC  

Good, the people using the service need to pay for it

2020-03-17 16:23:47 UTC  

It's not fair that car drivers should be subsidising rail

2020-03-17 16:27:35 UTC  

bro

2020-03-17 16:27:47 UTC  

we're gonna have french refugees on our doorstep soon

2020-03-17 16:29:13 UTC  

The problem with the railways right now is that the rail lines are privatised and many lines are for different kinds of trains so you can't do much. that is the argument for nationalising the entire railwas

2020-03-17 16:29:59 UTC  

i don't care if you pick fully private or fully nationalised

2020-03-17 16:30:07 UTC  

but the in the middle state is worse than either or

2020-03-17 16:30:46 UTC  

The only argument is nationalisation. It's either that or One private company controlling the entire thing

2020-03-17 16:31:15 UTC  

I don't think that's fair

2020-03-17 16:31:32 UTC  

you might have only had that, but I'm sure there are people who have an argument on the otherside

2020-03-17 16:32:02 UTC  

you have to understand how the rail infrastructure works to understand why its going to be either the government or one company

2020-03-17 16:32:07 UTC  

no in betweens

2020-03-17 16:32:11 UTC  

jesus

2020-03-17 16:32:13 UTC  

Err, the rail lines are all standardised

2020-03-17 16:32:23 UTC  

if you carry on being a big brain there will be no room left

2020-03-17 16:32:28 UTC  

We have one private company controlling the entire thing

2020-03-17 16:32:32 UTC  

🙄

2020-03-17 16:32:55 UTC  

And I don't care whether it's nationalised or not, provided i'm not subsidising it

2020-03-17 16:33:04 UTC  

It's users should be paying for it

2020-03-17 16:33:11 UTC  

i'm happy to subsidise if it's public

2020-03-17 16:33:14 UTC  

Just as car users should be paying for the road network

2020-03-17 16:33:16 UTC  

not if it's private

2020-03-17 16:33:24 UTC  

Okay bois, let me try to get some sense from you guys here. How many different types of trains run in the UK? and Do they all use one standardised rail lines?

2020-03-17 16:33:26 UTC  

Well it's private and you're subsidising it

2020-03-17 16:33:38 UTC  

yes, i said that earlier

2020-03-17 16:33:46 UTC  

i'm happy with fully private or fully public

2020-03-17 16:33:47 UTC  

There is one standardise rail line. Some lines are electrified, some not