Message from @Eccles
Discord ID: 690167960731516987
nationalisation - case by case basis. i won't agree on principle
natural monopolies should be nationalised
social projects - no, government should fuck off and not be involved in that
how about this:
things like the last steel producer should be government owned, we shouldn't let things like steel leave the land
nhs, this is an argument on what is most effective
rails sure
scrap VAT on heating and fuel, significantly reduce duty on fuel and alcohol - it should max out at the cost of the externalities of vice being taxed
end mass immigration
royal mail should never have been privatised
ban future corporate ownership of residential property, limit residential property ownership to 1 per person, and to co-operatives and non-rpfits
royal mail is utterly irrelevent to the cost of living
yes, but in principle
agree about "what is most effective"
royal mail had to be privatised as per EU's EC directive 97/67
we kno
Mail has to be nationalised because it takes investment to reach rural areas which private companies won't do
that's purely a fucking stupid argument
Doesnt that rule work with any business that has to provide in rural areas?
How so wladfa
has the privatisation of RM worked well so far?
For me to support nationalising things like RailTrack, and the National Grid, i'd need to see evidence that doing so would make it better
how good are train services and train fares Eccles?
No idea, FF, no railways around here
I resent subsidising it though
What would you rather have done for the rails
your arugment being stupid isn't the same as me thinking it shouldn't be privatised you moron
bommer gif for you ff
Mail is a public service that should be provided to everyone regardless of where they are. Private companies simply cannot do that and RM has failed already to do that and you think that s stupid argument lmao
it just shows how little you are aware of how things work at national scales
Rail? close it down
the logistics involved to provide the service
I'd like to see rail used more for freight
ANd not for rich londoners to fuck up rural economies
so you want some 40 million people to travel bu cars ?
I want the rail network to be self-sustaining and not subsidised by car drivers, most of which are significantly poorer than those using the rail they're subsidising
If you -must- subsidise rail, and I don't think we should, then pay for it out of general taxation
You want the rails to close down, so can you tell me what will the alternative be?
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Why would it close down?
> I want the rail network to be self-sustaining
> You want the rails to close down