and inflate that area

or at least just travel for 2 hous to the city and then 2 back

idk

maybe

ok, so that's how global economics works

still, the point of the corps is a must

well, they shouldn't

fuck China

china abuses it

why would I want to inflate chinks

ok, don't get side tracked here

maybe inflate them with air so they explode

i'm only pointing to what happens on a global scale

globalism ought to die

money moves to the lowest possible cost area and inflates the area's living standards by flooding capital into them

this drives up the cost of living, wages etc

then that money looks for the next place to go to whilst the people in that area start looking for better jobs that they want rather than need

China deflates it's currency in order to keep it attractive and the money flooding in

lmao, just block them off, like, the US has a navy that could blockade the entire coast of china and halt everything maritime

poor boris

i don't really care what happens to china

only to our country

and they they're screwed

if we take this model and look at it in our country

we could implament it on a local level

Well, China's fate is tied to yours

if money moves to the lowest possible cost area, why is london still full, and scotland/the north not

as evidenced by corona-chan

the money in london isn't the same money in china

so I guess boris will have to self isolate now?

it's not a zero sum

hows he gonna run the country?

@wacka from his couch

London has more to offer than the cost of it's employees

that's what i was nudging at - not as simple as that

yes, but I'm talking about the lowest earners

where that is important

have you scared the insecure attention-seeking socialist away now?

if you want to boost the lowest level earners then we allow the money to move where it's needed

say the valleys

BTFOd by FACTS and LOGIC