Message from @Sq crcl

Discord ID: 694287984555589652


@AdamBv1 btw, a general rule of infection more symtoms -> more things body do to cope with infection -> more resources required etc. But GI infection really concerns me considering what other type of infectious pathways it might take.

2020-03-30 20:21:05 UTC  

@Sq crcl Nothing is coming to mind but I wouldn't be surprised if something like that popped up in CA.

2020-03-30 20:21:18 UTC  
2020-03-30 20:21:24 UTC  

Haha, don't beeee meeeen hahaha
Thanks

2020-03-30 20:23:09 UTC  

"Coronavirus would the perfect opportunity for an autocrat. Trump isnt taking it" imagine being pissed at that.

2020-03-30 20:23:33 UTC  

<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>

2020-03-30 20:24:04 UTC  

Snowflake

2020-03-30 20:43:43 UTC  
2020-03-30 20:44:20 UTC  

It maybe got memed on a bit too hard and got out of hand...

2020-03-30 20:46:21 UTC  

Wow, that's quite the fluff piece. What they meant by all that was they changed the penalty from knowingly transmitting HIV to somebody from a felony to a misdemeanor.

2020-03-30 20:47:27 UTC  

It nagged me that I couldn't remember and had to find it...

2020-03-30 20:47:33 UTC  

Also, wtf...

2020-03-30 20:47:44 UTC  

Shouldn't it be the other way around?
To not decrease but increase the punishment?

2020-03-30 20:47:51 UTC  

I like this too:
> And HIV-negative individuals can take medication, known as PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis), to reduce the risk of acquiring HIV by up to 99 percent.

2020-03-30 20:48:00 UTC  

That's like soft incentivising exposure...

2020-03-30 20:48:15 UTC  

Oh, so it's as effective as birth control that fails surprisingly often?

2020-03-30 20:48:24 UTC  

Oh, dear

2020-03-30 20:48:37 UTC  

Let's drop it rather, y'know...😶

2020-03-30 20:52:25 UTC  
2020-03-30 20:52:34 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678532257924907018/694287982970142820/star-trek-smile-riker.gif

2020-03-30 20:53:06 UTC  

Very good catch!

2020-03-30 20:53:17 UTC  

Thanks **half-goat-man**

> @Crafty This study tested masks heated to between 80C and 120C, no masks seem to have a performance difference until 100C or over so masks can put up with a decent bit of heat without damage.
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781738/
@AdamBv1 why did I not see this reee? <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2020-03-30 20:54:29 UTC  

Dunno, did I not link that here or did you just find it now?

found it just now, gr8 read. We do decontanimate it and recycle them at specialised station but never generally directly doing it in home/doors.

2020-03-30 20:55:51 UTC  

I used that as verification that the dry oven technique works and no masks seemed to suffer from it below 100C.

well of course the lipid membrane of many organisms except extremophiles denaturate and open with many more different effects on them. Generally though I use UVC.

2020-03-30 20:58:38 UTC  

From what I was able to find coronaviruses denature at 60C.

2020-03-30 21:00:26 UTC  

And UVC works great but better on hard surfaces, does not penetrate well into filter media from what I could tell.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04881.x is one of the avaliable free text I use as a simple rough calc of how intense your need the UV to be.

Oh you just put a reflector and that increases the amount but you of course leave the area before starting.

2020-03-30 21:02:37 UTC  

Well that's nice to have a full paper on decontaminating with UVC.

2020-03-30 21:13:41 UTC  

@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ Hey, that last one is handy for showing their complete procedure.

2020-03-30 21:14:21 UTC  

Even if you use the oven method you can still learn from most of the steps shows if you don't already know how to safely deal with the contaminated masks.

2020-03-30 21:15:09 UTC  

Oh, wow...Very interesting.