Message from @Sq crcl
Discord ID: 694286934171713607
Nevermind then. No hard feelings. Thanks.
Jesus Christ man
@AdamBv1
I seem to recall some controversy around a bloodbank that wasn't going to refuse donors with AIDS or something... Do you recall something of the kind? Does it ring a bell to you? (idk, maybe it was a satire I have stuck in my mind for some odd reason)
@AdamBv1 btw, a general rule of infection more symtoms -> more things body do to cope with infection -> more resources required etc. But GI infection really concerns me considering what other type of infectious pathways it might take.
@Sq crcl Nothing is coming to mind but I wouldn't be surprised if something like that popped up in CA.
@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ Yeah, that makes sense.
Haha, don't beeee meeeen hahaha
Thanks
"Coronavirus would the perfect opportunity for an autocrat. Trump isnt taking it" imagine being pissed at that.
<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>
Snowflake
@AdamBv1
Guess what...
This is what I found...
https://www.aclusandiego.org/governor-signs-bill-modernizing-california-hiv-laws/
It maybe got memed on a bit too hard and got out of hand...
Wow, that's quite the fluff piece. What they meant by all that was they changed the penalty from knowingly transmitting HIV to somebody from a felony to a misdemeanor.
It nagged me that I couldn't remember and had to find it...
Also, wtf...
Shouldn't it be the other way around?
To not decrease but increase the punishment?
I like this too:
> And HIV-negative individuals can take medication, known as PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis), to reduce the risk of acquiring HIV by up to 99 percent.
That's like soft incentivising exposure...
Oh, so it's as effective as birth control that fails surprisingly often?
Let's drop it rather, y'know...😶
Very good catch!
Thanks **half-goat-man**
> @Crafty This study tested masks heated to between 80C and 120C, no masks seem to have a performance difference until 100C or over so masks can put up with a decent bit of heat without damage.
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781738/
@AdamBv1 why did I not see this reee? <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Dunno, did I not link that here or did you just find it now?
found it just now, gr8 read. We do decontanimate it and recycle them at specialised station but never generally directly doing it in home/doors.
I used that as verification that the dry oven technique works and no masks seemed to suffer from it below 100C.
well of course the lipid membrane of many organisms except extremophiles denaturate and open with many more different effects on them. Generally though I use UVC.
From what I was able to find coronaviruses denature at 60C.
And UVC works great but better on hard surfaces, does not penetrate well into filter media from what I could tell.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04881.x is one of the avaliable free text I use as a simple rough calc of how intense your need the UV to be.
Oh you just put a reflector and that increases the amount but you of course leave the area before starting.
Well that's nice to have a full paper on decontaminating with UVC.
@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ Thanks.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19/n-95-decon-process.pdf in addition to that. @AdamBv1 <:smugon:512048583806025739>