Message from @Missbehaved
Discord ID: 696383804641640478
i put people like that on par with the qanon types batshit crazy
Or flat-earthers
US high band 5G frequencies in use:
AT&T: 39GHz
T-Mobile: 39GHz
Sprint: 2.5GHz (halfassed deployment, they will be using T-Mobile's network in the future.
Verizon: 28GHz
Companies are claiming further 5G deployment but that's using existing low band frequencies.
You know, the ones used since 2G.
I put people who take the word of government officails, with undeclared vested fiscal intrests in commercial enterprises ie. 5G - who make off the cuff statements regarding the safety aspects of this technology - on my 'This one's a total moron' list.
This is more news than a random cookie article on radiation from 2018
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
NO STUDIES exist to prove that there is no inherent risk at either 28, 39, or 60GHz.. so that invalidates your argument. In the original study which was produced - the sfatey claim was based on an individual making ONE call per WEEK. Let that sink in, before you @ me.
ONE call PER WEEK... and with that. all safety concerns were brushed aside. ..
@Sq crcl There's nothing wrong with that radiation pneumonitis article other than thinking it can apply to 5G, you get 10 orders of magnitude more energy pumped into you during radiation treatment than standing 10 yards from cell tower. That's because radiation treatment is literally designed to kill living tissue and unsurprisingly it has side effects on nearby tissue.
My issue was that it was brought up without any ties, random and them the fact that it's 2 years old
Men are well advised NOT to carry their phone in their front trouser pocket - Guess why.
And mind you, this is a news channel
But I guess it doesn't matter to some, they just spam
Yeah, not news so we probably should let this whole topic slide.
That'd be better for now and jump at it again should anything interesting come out **as news**
But that's just me.
@Sq crcl posts about neanderthalls fighting over shit paper is kind of peurile ..but if that's more your bag.. then, by all means.
@Sq crcl So you ARE the arbiter of what can be regarded as 'NEWS' ? Geez.. sorry I mistook you for just another pleb. meanwhile I was literally conversing with God... who knew.
> @Sq crcl The article you referred to - about Radiation Pneumonitis, which I linked, stikes me as quite apt. Maybe there is more to the theory that 5G is unsafe, and may be causal in the onset of symptoms of 'Covid19'
@Missbehaved
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
lol wut. my favorite part is the quotes around COVID-19 <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> Hahahaha
good recording
forgot to complement the other day
thanks man, glad you enjoyed it 🙂
my main issue with the 5G towers is that supposedly a lot of the hardware and the stuff needed to build them and run the network is made in China. I personally would not have an issue with 5G necessarily, but only if the materials are not sourced from China.
As far as the supposed damage caused by them. pfft please. give me a break.
(not good gaii)
> my main issue with the 5G towers is that supposedly a lot of the hardware and the stuff needed to build them and run the network is made in China. I personally would not have an issue with 5G necessarily, but only if the materials are not sourced from China.
Sure. Reasonable.
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
The whole world has become racist by sjw standards as everyone has made some form of a clause about NOT allowing crucial supplies to be exported
the dude says "massive deployment of small cells"
and the dude writes "MASSIVE DEPLOYMENT OF TOWERS" in the side bar
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
its like bruh common.
Link me the scientific study which has the approval - not of the WHO obvsly - ..which proves that the deployment of 5G is so safe -you can literally install a transmitter in your children's bedrooms. Go on.
its not my job to provide proof as to why its NOT harmful lol