Message from @Missbehaved
Discord ID: 696401328741548053
>politics
>general
>debates
<:thunk:462282216467333140>
seem pretty clearly labeled to me, but you know... maybe my brain hasnt been scrambled by the 5G towers yet 😉
2.4 GhZ is harmful enough.
60Ghz is just insane
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> no lol i thought that gif was funny tho
link didnt work prometheus
that link has all the studies you need to make statements on the dangers of non ionizing radiation
lel its been taken down
is it not the dots in the middle?
the link doesnt seem to be formatted properly
idk im tech stoopid hold on
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
there we go
🧐 alright lets see
see @Missbehaved this is how you provide some info that is more persuasive
@UnScottable school me Daddy ❤️
heres the thing. if we know that 2.5ghz causes some damage in rats.
1. just because something happens in rats does not mean that the effects are exactly the same in humans
2. What proof do we have that 60Ghz would be more damaging? what proof is there that increasing the frequency causes proportionally more damage?
the organs of a rat are much much smaller then a humans. the methods they use to smell things and so on are also much much different. the 2.5Ghz frequency could effect these senses and etc in a way that is much different then they would a human because of the size difference and so on.
So idk.. I mean its interesting, and worth investigating further for sure. But I dont know if people should be burning down 5G towers like they are
I think you are just afraid that you might join them if you dig any deeper.
what do you mean by that
Burning down towers takes effort and waxing intelligent on discord is just ezier
its hard to burn metal broo
show me the towers youve burnt pussy
hey. they havnt been put up yet
ill make sure to get back to you then
okie
must not be too pressing for them then lol
youd think if this did all the damage people say and that they were doing this on purpose theyd have them up by now. but you know, that just is thinking to much for your liking isnt it?
they have very short range so i really doubt they will be covering everywhere
I have changed my mind on many things, like fluoride for example. I didnt buy the fluoride being in everything being harmful stuff until I saw some evidence and changed my course. Im not without reason
@UnScottable
> The animals were pair-housed in groups of four in steel mesh cages and placedabout 10 cm away from installed devices that emitted RF-EMF
Dunno about you but I don't sit that close to my router. They also don't seem to mention power level at all so even the distance value seems utterly useless as I can't gauge a dose from it.
I have to cummute in to central London tomorrow to go to my job in the National elf service, and I am literally shitting myself over it..
> @UnScottable
> Dunno about you but I don't sit that close to my router. They also don't seem to mention power level at all so even the distance value seems utterly useless as I can't gauge a dose from it.
@AdamBv1
oh no someone actually read the study <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
no no adam dont do that!