But do go on with the "UR JUST 2 DUM 2 SEE HOW SMEART I IS", it's absolutely entertaining.

>criticizes Nietzsche's writing because he thinks it's me
>Continues pretending to not be an absolute imbecile

Dude, the idea that your criticism means anything at all to me, at this point, is ludicrous. You essentially look at extremely complex philosophical writing and project your own extreme idiocy onto it, assuming that because you can't make sense of it that it doesn't make sense.

Honestly, after this hilarious self own of yours I am 100% convinced that speaking to you further is unnecessary and am just going to block you so that I don't have to be exposed to your trite bullshit. @Hexidecimark

Tell me, how many seasons of Rick & Morty do I have to watch to be fully capable of grasping your points? How many books prior to my being able to reason the right way, and at what point will I be so enraptured with your statements as to venerate you as an immortal God? Do you perhaps have a threshold for IQ before you're willing to interact with another human being in good faith?

Oh dear me, seems he's too much of a snowflake to even answer that.

*Nietzsche was wrong*

One of the most overrated philosophers of all time

Am not gonna say Kant was teh shit either, but the fact that Nietzsche criticized Kant doesn't mean anything.

Sounds like someone needs to watch more rick & morty pal. Phaedraddeausadaa has so many IQ points that he's considered the most intelligent man on earth

Nietzsche thought he could present a solution to the dilemma of the dissolution of religion. In his quest he came up with the concept of the eternal return, so that people who lose their religion can see their finite timespan as more meaningful than it really is when embracing the nihilist mindset. However, he failed to realize that this works neither on people with low intellect (because they don't grasp his ideas) nor high intellect (because they do grasp it and see its holes).

Since the eternal return is a complete failure, his idea of the superman fails as well, because to attain it you must delude yourself into thinking far beyond your existence in the physical realm. You'd have to consider yourself an eternal being that keeps returning and improving (the most stupid idea I've ever heard, yet even some quite educated philosophers fall for it).

Nietzsche thought he had a solution for that, too. He thought that you could simply see your limited timespan as a living creature as part of the eternal return. Your efforts would have to show in this life, but not actually in this life. The idea itself would have to become your goal. The goal becomes that you delude yourself.

Basically religion 2.0, but way way way more illogical.

Nietzsche's superman can therefore only lead to delusions of grandeur. You can't keep trying to improve yourself for eternity, all while believing you're actually stuck in a loop. And since the only object of worship would become you yourself (because self-improvement replaces heaven as the ultimate desire), you can only become a self-deluded egomaniac.

tl;dr Nietzsche was a fraud. In his works there are several points where one could argue that he even recognizes that he's a fraud.

I think he should've just stopped at "rely on yourself for happiness instead of a space daddy"

But I guess since he thought that would lead to a nihilist mindset (which it doesn't have to, there are philosophies that severely diminish the nihilism) he felt compelled to create a sort of cult idea (that, ironically, went on to be misused in multiple ways that he didn't foresee)

I think I made Phadreus sad so now he won't even pretend to engage

He generally doesn't like to engage with people who can actually properly address his arguments.

Also lol at "Nietzsche had an IQ of 180"
It's impossible to know or even estimate the true IQ of people who never took an IQ test.

Not only that, but it's also a non-argument.

@ETBrooD I know how to measure ppls IQ becuz I am bigbrain <:smugon:512048583806025739> especially when IQ test were not invented yet.

What's Trump's IQ?

Or no wait, better, Joe Biden <:Veemote:501103628883591188>

69420 @ETBrooD <:smugon:512048583806025739> see it works

Phadreus is the new BK.

CMM.

That's very mean. BKP had a point with some of his arguments.

Especially about the damage done by lezbos and women too society . But he backpeddled saying that women are not able too take responsibility becuz biology <:sadgon:544640228166598657>

"The damage women have to society"?

Oh you're talking about someone else

@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ Not my estimate

@ETBrooD Again, not my estimate, and, also, there was never an argument. Just a retard sperging.

> He generally doesn't like to engage with people who can actually properly address his arguments.
@ETBrooD Bullshit, when people actually come with arguments I respond. Hex didn't, Hex came with retard level sperging that amounted to a waste of time and a headache. I have no interest in that at all. But hey, if you think him confusing a nietzsche quote for my own writing and making an ad hom based on the- supposed- flaws I that writing in an "argument"... Well, there's no cure for stupidity.

As for the rest of your comment? I fail to see how your opinion of nietzsche is relevant to the conversation in any way? You may even be correct, though I don't really care if you are considering it ***has literally nothing to do*** with the beginning conversation and is just some random of topic tangent for the sake of tangent.

*Posting a Nietzsche wall of text without announcing it as such in the beginning of the wall then complaining about people thinking it's not a Nietzsche quote but one's own personal take and getting debated over it then complaining about not actually facing any arguments but only sperging because when I do it it's an argument but when others do it it's sperging*

We were talking about Kant, not nietzsche, and no, btw, nietzsche isn't wrong and about Kant.

You posted a Nietzsche quote without announcing it then got butthurt because someone thought it was your own take

That's written as the first sentence in the definition of sperg

Lol, says right there that it's a nietzsche quote, not my fault if the retard didn't read it.

It says it at the end, not the start, so not other people's fault for mistaking it

> *Posting a Nietzsche wall of text without announcing it as such in the beginning of the wall then complaining about people thinking it's not a Nietzsche quote but one's own personal take and getting debated over it then complaining about not actually facing any arguments but only sperging because when I do it it's an argument but when others do it it's sperging*
@ETBrooD See, now **you're** sperging

I also thought it was your own take until I got to the end, so I think you're the one who messed up, not others