"The damage women have to society"?

Oh you're talking about someone else

@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ Not my estimate

@ETBrooD Again, not my estimate, and, also, there was never an argument. Just a retard sperging.

> He generally doesn't like to engage with people who can actually properly address his arguments.
@ETBrooD Bullshit, when people actually come with arguments I respond. Hex didn't, Hex came with retard level sperging that amounted to a waste of time and a headache. I have no interest in that at all. But hey, if you think him confusing a nietzsche quote for my own writing and making an ad hom based on the- supposed- flaws I that writing in an "argument"... Well, there's no cure for stupidity.

As for the rest of your comment? I fail to see how your opinion of nietzsche is relevant to the conversation in any way? You may even be correct, though I don't really care if you are considering it ***has literally nothing to do*** with the beginning conversation and is just some random of topic tangent for the sake of tangent.

*Posting a Nietzsche wall of text without announcing it as such in the beginning of the wall then complaining about people thinking it's not a Nietzsche quote but one's own personal take and getting debated over it then complaining about not actually facing any arguments but only sperging because when I do it it's an argument but when others do it it's sperging*

We were talking about Kant, not nietzsche, and no, btw, nietzsche isn't wrong and about Kant.

You posted a Nietzsche quote without announcing it then got butthurt because someone thought it was your own take

That's written as the first sentence in the definition of sperg

Lol, says right there that it's a nietzsche quote, not my fault if the retard didn't read it.

It says it at the end, not the start, so not other people's fault for mistaking it

> *Posting a Nietzsche wall of text without announcing it as such in the beginning of the wall then complaining about people thinking it's not a Nietzsche quote but one's own personal take and getting debated over it then complaining about not actually facing any arguments but only sperging because when I do it it's an argument but when others do it it's sperging*
@ETBrooD See, now **you're** sperging

I also thought it was your own take until I got to the end, so I think you're the one who messed up, not others

It **literally** says it's a nietzsche quote and Hex didn't know that because he ***didn't even read it.***

And now you're butthurt over the fact that people are acting like normal people who aren't perfect even though you made a mistake yourself

Get over yourself

Wow, you mean you actually read it and realized it was a quote. Imagine that.

I didn't make a mistake. At all. Not in any way, even a little bit.

I realized it at the end, but I was almost not gonna finish reading it because it contained so much drivel

"drivel"

So I don't fault anyone for not noticing it's not your own personal view

"I don't fsult this retard for sperging out and ad homing you over something he didn't even read" <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Cool story

Next time put your arguments in a more digestible form and don't get butthurt when someone makes a mistake due to the poor form of your argument

Get over yourself

You're not perfect, you made a mistake, and someone else also made a mistake, now get over it instead of telling people they're spergs for being flawed humans just like you are one, too

"durrrrr my opinions about nietzsche are right because durrrrr, read my off topic rant that nobody cares about durrrrr, it's your fault for being ad hommed by an idiot who didn't even read your post, durrrrrr, get over yourself durrrrr"

You're not better than anyone else here, deal with it

I didnt make any mistakes. Sometimes I do, however, in this situation I did not.

I never pretended to be perfect.

I'm better than a lot of people at a lot things; most people are. Nothing to "deal with".

I was referring to their shared inability to participate in any real discussion and instead just projecting their inner dialogue. As much as I despise some of your ideas you can at least carry a conversation....

Are you talking about me? <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Not desiring to discuss complicated philosophy with ***retarded people*** isn't the same as being incapable of discussion. In fact, I've been conversating here quite readily for some time now, some of the conversations even being rather constructive. Almost as though the actual problems are the retarded sperg, a lack wit boomer(you) and this virtue signaling loser @ETBrooD who literally never even made an argument and just did an off-topic rant about how a philosopher wasn't right about everything. (literally common sense and applies to every philosopher that has ever lived)

Virtue signalling doesn't mean what you think it means

Unlike nietzsche, Kant wasn't right about ANYTHING. He was a charlatan completely.

That's your opinion

@ETBrooD Yeah it does. Literally the only reason you're participating in this conversation is in defense of Hex. That's it. Just you spewing your virtue and pretending to be a good person for standing up for somebody who's incapable of having an actual debate.

> That's your opinion

Durrrrrr, thank you captain obvious!

You stated a huge claim as fact

So I felt the need to point it out that this is your opinion

When you make such a big claim, you should be aware how radical it is, and either present proper argumentation to back it up, or just say it's your opinion
Not refer to Nietzsche's quote, and add "he's 180 IQ"