Otherwise a bad God could create bad morals

Morals haven't been a thing, because otherwise societies would have the same morals

if morals were a thing you "discover"

So why did God create Satan.

Well

As the story goes

This metaphysical theory you're putting through doesn't sound like it's all that solid.

He was an angel

it isn't solid, its garbage

The story doesn't make any sense, because it implies there are forces beyond god's control.

That rebelled against God

beyond an "omnipotent god"s control

I mean

It could be said that he allowed it to happen to balance out the universe.

Think about it like this, is God is all powerful could he then create a rock that even he couldn't lift?

"He rebelled and then became a wicked being and then created a wicked place and I can't do much about all that now. It's done."

Dark and light blah blah.

... It's like

What the fuck?

God has a problem he wasn't able to solve? lol

The Problem of Evil has vexed Abrahamic religions for millenia.

At the end of times, Satan himself will be casted into hell.

If he could, he creates morals, if he cant morals are superior to him

And here's where people say "Divine plan"

And that's when you know the conversation is over, and you won it.

Why's that?

... I just explained

what if god has super telepathic powers but a weak physical body? 😉

Also

You can’t win a conversation about religion.

the rock lifting argument is stupid cuz god could just limit his physical strength and tadaaah

Nobody knows enough.

he can't lift it anymore

@Spectre9 Your explanation was really weak and mine is better.

You guys made the biggest mistake

@Scribblehatch you failed as soon as you jumped in.

Remember these words.

I never started a land war in Asia.

wrong Spectre9,

You don't know enough if "a god exists"

But any religion of humanity can be disproven 😉

An object will always follow the path of least resistance. All macroeconomic propositions that can't be reduced to microeconomic propositions are invalid. Individualism is scalable. Collectivism is unable to distinguish between the whole and its parts. The only valid collectivist claim is that the cosmos is uniform and static, but action is meaningless from this perspective. God does not act. Humans act. The natural sciences are a subset of praxeology.

**Newton’s Flaming Laser Sword.**