Message from @RyeNorth

Discord ID: 687693259987746876


2020-03-12 16:03:05 UTC  

Implying that States conceded their rights in the same manner as those who are anti-assault rifle are demanding.

2020-03-12 16:03:36 UTC  

Or are you wrestling with some cognatice dissonance here because I pointed out a flaw in an otherwise solid president?

2020-03-12 16:03:50 UTC  

Given the precedence, their logic isn't wrong. If you allow people to break rules and make exceptions when it suits you, what do you expect?

2020-03-12 16:03:50 UTC  

Do you worship the man, or the good he did?

2020-03-12 16:04:15 UTC  

I'm pointing out your blatent inconstency

2020-03-12 16:04:31 UTC  

Mine?

2020-03-12 16:04:33 UTC  

I don't see any people regularly bitching about the violation of States Rights

2020-03-12 16:04:59 UTC  

Pfft. You're not in my discord.

2020-03-12 16:05:11 UTC  

Yet, you'll try to rest on the Constitutional argument alone when it comes to banning assault rifles?"

2020-03-12 16:05:11 UTC  

You're making MAJOR assumptions.

2020-03-12 16:05:28 UTC  

No, i'd demandig you STATE your assumptions explictly

2020-03-12 16:05:54 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678531385123667998/687692856928108648/Screenshot_20200312-110536868.jpg

2020-03-12 16:06:02 UTC  

The Constituional argument is a flimsy one because you are apperhently quite satisfied with the Federal Gov violating it in other areas

2020-03-12 16:06:13 UTC  

I.e. Posse Cumataus for example

2020-03-12 16:06:15 UTC  

Sit down.

2020-03-12 16:06:20 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678531385123667998/687692963916152862/Screenshot_20200312-120151_Chrome.png

2020-03-12 16:06:50 UTC  

You don't know shit about me.

2020-03-12 16:07:03 UTC  

Your ARGUMENT implies this

2020-03-12 16:07:13 UTC  

implications are assumptions

2020-03-12 16:07:19 UTC  

Which argument?

2020-03-12 16:07:29 UTC  

Quote me.

2020-03-12 16:07:58 UTC  

"The difference is irrelevant if you're making a constitutional argument."

2020-03-12 16:08:02 UTC  

I wasn't

2020-03-12 16:08:04 UTC  

you were

2020-03-12 16:08:10 UTC  

Sure

2020-03-12 16:08:40 UTC  

given the constitutional argument simply dismissed on pre-requisite maters, do you not see the connection?

2020-03-12 16:08:45 UTC  

Ex: My state is PA

2020-03-12 16:09:06 UTC  

our state const states: "THe right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED"

2020-03-12 16:09:13 UTC  

You're implying I see no problem with that

2020-03-12 16:09:26 UTC  

now, if the contitutional argument HELD states would be allowed to decide for themselves

2020-03-12 16:09:34 UTC  

but those rules aren't honored

2020-03-12 16:09:57 UTC  

A problem.

2020-03-12 16:10:12 UTC  

So dismissing my original assertion in favor of Consitutional law assumes that the prerequistes still apply

2020-03-12 16:10:13 UTC  

Unless I'm misunderstanding you.

2020-03-12 16:10:42 UTC  

We're talking about Reagan's statements, and modern Democrat statements.

2020-03-12 16:10:49 UTC  

yes, correct.

2020-03-12 16:10:52 UTC  

And how they're copy-pasted.

2020-03-12 16:11:09 UTC  

I am pointing out that it was a different world with different priorities and a different audience

2020-03-12 16:11:28 UTC  

the democratic party of that era was nothing like the democratic party today

2020-03-12 16:11:43 UTC  

at least everyone acknowledge the bigger threat

2020-03-12 16:11:44 UTC  

Let me spell this out then