yeah, but can only load/unload in major ports

https://imgur.com/WpE2FJI

railyards

That's dumb as shit

Yes

Roads are purposefully indirect

still need to load with cranes

Railroads are direct as possible

You'd be giving up much of the advantages of railways if you had to have them tied to roads

You move bulk to a point then transfer to far more agile trucking

RORO does away with cranes, taking the whole truck/car like a ferry across a channe;

it depends really

some places have direct connections, some don't

Oh God it's actually the retarded dystopian commie dream he's got

I dunno why you think moving the whole truck by rail is any better than it being done normaly

some inherited the carriageway connections

Railcars atm are way too small to carry trucks lol

Also your acronym is retarded

If it requires cranes

It by definition

The us train can be expanded but the way freight is handled in the US is virtually unchallenged anywhere in the us in terms of robustness and effectiveness.

Cannot be roll on roll off

Bernies plan is fucked

hes a commie

of course its fucked

the us frieght system is shit

It literally isn't

it's just BETTER shit than most

Roro isn't a solution

dude, they do it the same way they have done for decades

boomer tech

@NinjaQuick for context about mas thoughts on transport he thinks that cargo boats should be replaced by intercontinental trains

Makes sense.

Or. Boats that can easily roll into rail tracks

standard gauge used by freight is what PREVENTS utilizing high-speed rail system wide

@Lucienne d'Anwyl https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kZlAbOc-EtA/maxresdefault.jpg

Just

Lay high speed rail for passengers.

The point of cargo boats is their capacity for a *large* amount of cargo in one go >.>

doesn't WORK that way

Freight at high speed is a bad and unnecessary idea