Message from @NinjaQuick
Discord ID: 688409139562676329
less cars on the road, less wear and tear
Us uses rail and trucking tho
Lol
So just have q billion empty train cars
On the road
At all times
*for your convenience*
yeah, but can only load/unload in major ports
railyards
That's dumb as shit
Yes
Roads are purposefully indirect
still need to load with cranes
Railroads are direct as possible
You'd be giving up much of the advantages of railways if you had to have them tied to roads
You move bulk to a point then transfer to far more agile trucking
RORO does away with cranes, taking the whole truck/car like a ferry across a channe;
it depends really
some places have direct connections, some don't
I dunno why you think moving the whole truck by rail is any better than it being done normaly
some inherited the carriageway connections
Railcars atm are way too small to carry trucks lol
Also your acronym is retarded
If it requires cranes
It by definition
The us train can be expanded but the way freight is handled in the US is virtually unchallenged anywhere in the us in terms of robustness and effectiveness.
Cannot be roll on roll off
Bernies plan is fucked
hes a commie
of course its fucked
the us frieght system is shit
It literally isn't
it's just BETTER shit than most
Roro isn't a solution
dude, they do it the same way they have done for decades
boomer tech
@NinjaQuick for context about mas thoughts on transport he thinks that cargo boats should be replaced by intercontinental trains
Makes sense.
Or. Boats that can easily roll into rail tracks