Reality has a bias.

However, the concept of social constructs is a social construct. Anything you deem a social construct is only as true as the frame you use.

For anything politically charged

how metamodern of you bro

PRIMARY DOCUMENTS ON THE HOLOCAUST
https://fcit.usf.edu/holocaust/resource/document/document.htm
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/holocaust/?show=all#more
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/world-war-ii-history/pictures/remembering-the-holocaust/wedding-rings-taken-from-concentration-camp-inmates
LOOK FOR YOURSELF
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/the-holocaust/pictures/holocaust-concentration-camps/gas-chamber-at-auschwitz
HOW HISTORIANS CAME TO 6 MIL NUMBER
Richard Korherr was the head of the SS statistics bureau and in March 1943 he compiled a report about the decrease in Jewish population in Europe from 1932 to December 1942. He arrives at the conclusion that through normal decrease due to the death rate, due to emigration and due to German policy, the number of Jews in Europe has decreased about 4 million from 32 to 42. With regards to about 1.2 million Jews, he uses the phrase "Es wurden durchgeschleust durch die Lager im Generalgouvernement" (Guided through the camps in the General Government), which was what Himmler suggested he use instead of "Sonderbehandlung" (special treatment). This is Nazi code language for killed. So we know that by December 42, the head of the SS office for statistics gives a number of killed Jews that is 1.2 million.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/76avmk/how_do_we_estimate_the_number_of_jewish_deaths_in/
https://www.ns-archiv.de/verfolgung/korherr/korherr-lang.php
ENGLISH http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/korherr.html
https://www.hdot.org/vanpelt/#
http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/einsatz/situationreport.html
TYPICAL DENNIAL DEBUNKED CLAIMS
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/549oah/holocaust_questions/ I'll just leave this here

Hit me up when you've spotted the grand conspiracy in all those sources

Woke

>reddit

>trusting historians

Lol

are we still debating the Holobunga

yes all jews that couldve died for any reason during that time should be counted

holy shit discord is a time machine

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

the scammies and snoke ails don't matter just the number

can we debate literally anything else other then whether or not 6 million jews were gassed 80 years ok please

haha get rekt gentile

they somehow managed to burn all the bodies too

> (Guided through the camps in the General Government), which was what Himmler suggested he use instead of "Sonderbehandlung" (special treatment). This is Nazi code language for killed.

Is it, though?

If they were openly in favour of killing them and thought is as virtuous, they would be flaunting it.

*"Yes, we do actually have pretty advanced oven technology."*

https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/body-disposal/

they actually had perforated tapes computer systems

You don't use code language to cover up your actions if you believe it to be just.

provided by ibm or sumsuch

Those are rookie numbers

uh what later became ibm maybe? not sure on that one

this man has definitely read more than sixty paragraphs all related to an event that never mattered in his lifetime

Finns confirmed bad at cleaning.

One of the reasons deniers need to make this argument is that they must find a justification for building so many ovens. This argument also involves the amount of bodies these new ovens could dispose of in a 24 hour period. A report from the Bauleitung in June 1943, after all of the new ovens became operational for at least some period, placed the cremation capacity of all 52 ovens at 4756 per day. [20] Deniers have not totally agreed among themselves on this issue, but Butz and Mattogno place the cremation capacity at about 1000 per day, or 30,000 per month. [21] Mattogno claimed the maximum cremation capacity of the six original ovens was 120 per day, [22] even though he was familiar with evidence from another concentration camp that showed a Topf double muffle oven could burn 52 per day or 26 per muffle. [23]

But the lampshades you bigot <:sargone:465483910638469131>

<:sargone:465483910638469131>

Meh jew gold

Nazis are like pokémon. Their one and only move for burning things is ovens.

<:thinkgon:560211224923734026>

I don't know why you argue about the past constantly.

There are jews alive TODAY.

And we live in TODAY.

Do something about that first, worry about history later.

OKAY, **maybe** it happened. But 6 million? That's a stretch

The evidence for this comes from data available on the Gusen ovens which show that each oven could burn on the average about 26 bodies per day, so that both ovens could together burn at least 52 bodies per day or about 1500 per month. [69] However, as will be seen later, these ovens could also substantially exceed this number. The highest monthly death total for Gusen was 1719. [70] This means that the six Auschwitz ovens could have consumed about 4500 per month. The highest monthly death total for registered prisoners at Auschwitz was 9000 in September 1942. Yet, as early as October 1941 the Bauleitung had ordered an additional 15 ovens. Even if we accept Mattogno's low estimate of the burning capacity of these ovens as being 20 per day, the existing six ovens in place by mid-1942 and the additional 15 would have enabled the authorities to dispose of 420 bodies per day or about 12,500 per month.

andrew popa is big brain as you can see by this copy pasting

so all the ovens that were accounted for, used for day to day cremation, were 52

and the net amount was strictly 1k per day, 30k per month