Petersons icon is a lobster

what a strange world, where the left has corporate power and includes conservative religousness

eyyy, its Timmy-boy

Moin, Tim

why ain't ya got RDR2?

great, Tim is gonna beat me now 😭

with his Beanie

and be like "Bad wol!"

when did the left start relying on corporate power?

You: arguing over consoles
Me, an intellectual: Waiting to emulate them all

seems like a recent thing

when they realised its good money

and using banks to silence people... mental

money is power,

And any authoritarian craves power

https://youtu.be/ZsIUjxOXFkE

yes

makes me think things like bitcoin will be sent underground and become more powerful

Thats why we get to protest the politician

Someone told my that my views are kinda Hoppean....

Kings would get us killed

If banks start banning people for their speech, you will get a black-market of money

which will result in banks losing money

The ethnostate's Federal reserve will be printing bitcoins.

If you have to choose between Kohl, Merkel or a King, what would you choose?

In space.

takes a few popular people to be silenced by banks and can only resort to btc for it to become widely used

I'd choose pinochet!

I choose YOU, pinochet!

also i dont know this Kohl

as long as its not Austria-Hungarian dudes that lost his squad in WW1....

The drunkard British king who didn't interfere with the markart.

I forget his name.

Henry the 8th?

@Dr.Wol https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/helmut-kohl1.jpg
That's him

the one that broke the German Constitution in 1990

```"I have certainly never contended that generally authoritarian governments are more likely to secure individual liberty than democratic ones, but rather the contrary. This does not mean, however, that in some historical circumstances personal liberty may not have been better protected under an authoritarian than democratic government. (...) More recently I have not been able to find a single person even in much maligned Chile who did not agree that personal freedom was much greater under Pinochet than it had been under Allende. Nor have I heard any sensible person claim that in the principalities of Monaco or Lichtenstein, which I am told are not precisely democratic, personal liberty is smaller than anywhere else!"
-Hayek.```

well in that image he has a halo over his head, so i'd vote for him, he's clearly an angel

```"Well, I would say that, as long-term institutions, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. As you will understand, it is possible for a dictator to govern in a liberal way. And it is also possible for a democracy to govern with a total lack of liberalism. Personally I prefer a liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism. My personal impression — and this is valid for South America — is that in Chile, for example, we will witness a transition from a dictatorial government to a liberal government. And during this transition it may be necessary to maintain certain dictatorial powers, not as something permanent, but as a temporary arrangement."
-F.A Hayek.```

I declare myself dictator of this discord for the next 15 minutes

btc is coiling to an interesting spot