maybe it's because it's more republican

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

I need definite evidence of dishonesty and bias

Yeah, I am looking over the content of Freedom House now.

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to research Freedom House and find evidence of dishonesty, hypocricy and bias

It seems pretty establishment.

https://www.youtube.com/user/FreedomHouseDC/videos

as a side note, does anyone actually use the talk rooms?

Just put everything in General

Freedom House says "LGBTQIA" so that's a hint of a leaning already

well if they're pro-democracy, they're limited in the capacity of freedom

Yeah, they are kind of social justicy.

But they bring it up in valid contexts, such as actually repressive regimes.

They steer clear of the controversial issues.

Look at the description

they were establishment from the beginning

Makes sense

Yes, they seem kind of run of the mill establishment do gooders.

They have John Oliver on their YT channel

Yes. They are kind of SJW-ish.

It's a weird mix of an organization with seemingly conservative roots catering to the mainstream progressivism.

yeah

It's emblematic of the limp wristed neocons who bow and scrape to regressives, while paying some lip service to conservative values.

they have a global foothold

https://freedomhouse.org/content/our-history

https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2017_Audited_Financial_Statements.pdf

I gtg to class

It's one of those non-profits for elbow rubbing politicons.

I'm not impressed.

They seem pretty irrelevant.

anyone who thinks america is a democracy shouldn't be taken seriously

heck it all looks the same to me

Here's something I don't understand. Why are left wing politicians hell bent on making nationalism rascist for white people, but would look the other way when non whites declare nationalism?

Cos white nationalists are given more media attention