but its impossible without a world like star trek's federation

Star Trek isn't communist though. It's not a stateless classless society.

what

oh

i missed the not

@Scribblehatch I agree as a good film it failed, but as a summer cash grab, yeah it worked. Just have low expectations

🇳 🇴 🇨 🇴 🇲 🇲 🇮 🇪 🇸

Was will smith not considered the lead in men in black?

Spawn sucks.

REEEE!

Bitch please.

I couldn't even rewatch it as a guilty pleasure.

It just grates too much.

In star trek, there is no money. Everyone just does what they want to do.
There is no need to work to provide a living, living is provided by technology

No money but still social currency.

Star Trek's more of a liberal utopia. Communism is more than a lot of welfare.

The federation is total welfare state. Everything is free.

This is what you do when there's no money to earn or spend.

And what do you mean there is still social currency

You start swashbuckling with computer simulations of your captain.

Communism isn't a synonym for welfare though.

you're the one who brought up welfare

In star trek social standing could clearly be traded for things like better asignments.

oh, nm, i misread what you said

Also didn't the federation have money to trade with other governments?

SoulCalibur 2 is best SoulCalibur. Change my mind.

I don't remember discussions about money.

Only materials.

@grant in *starfleet*, yes. The federation as a social colony, no.

Which they could like.. transport or replicate.

**WE REQUIRE MORE MINERALS.**

I wish I had more minerals

Once you have replicators, I think MINERALS becomes the currency.

So you can replicate things.

🇲 🇮 🇳 🇪 🇷 🇦 🇱 🇸

A healthy, varied supply of minerals.

maybe its convenient to have currency to trade minerals

Mmm, minerals.

Challenge ignored. Nobody can contest. My comments on SC2 will be henceforth considered an absolute truth.

"We need... BANANANANAFOFANITE."