Message from @The Ghost of Monarchies
Discord ID: 514154834312560650
its about being able to defend the country
oh
militias back then had artillery
it's not for defense
it's a beautiful artistic and political statement
a mushroom cloud is protected speech
well it doesnt HAVE to be for defence but according to the wording it would have to be sufficient for defence. Against other nations
yes you have the right unconditionaly but the reason is given.
the reason why that right exists
and back then private entities did own weapons way more powerful than beltfed turrets
such as battleships
with dozends of canons
The second amendment is explicitly for being armed well enough to resist and oppose a tyrannical domestic government, to defend against foreign is just a bonus
As well as home defense, hunting, sport shooting, etc, are all just pleasant additions to your ability to bear arms
And yeah, recreational nukes are to make a statement, not to overthrow anyone.
Plop one in the oceans as a metaphorical representation of how corporations treat the oceans via pollution.
This isn't the first time the american government has casually talked about nuking it's own citizens btw. There was an old statement by our goverment where the comteplated aerial bursts of nuclear weapons to shut down cities via EMP waves.
@The Ghost of Monarchies no, its explicitly to defend yourself on the global stage. *neccessary for the security of a free state "
something that bears a striking amount of common ground with UFO and aliens concepts
if that free state is threatened by foreign militaries, it should be sufficient to defend the state with it
lights in sky, engines and electronics dying, etc
Sorry, I don't believe that the government is going to nuke it's citizens. The military would not follow that order.
if free state is threatened by other nations militaries it should be sufficient to defend the state
so, yes, it would include intercontinental missles
by the wording of it
It does reveal how psychopathic the gungrabbers are, though.
The thing is, plenty of people in the military would fight the government if it gave orders to hurt the citizens.
Also yeah if the government ordered the military against American Citizens, it'd immediately refuse and eat up those in the military that didn't refuse first
It'd cause immediate infighting
@Hiniku hence the globalist agenda, if not our military then this new EU gladly would. Or they would just provoke a mad response
There would be so much in fighting in a war where the government was ordering the military against us.
yeah
what i find funny is
I hate this global bullshit. How do those people even get elected?
now the eu army is seen as a rightwing talking point
i remember when leftists were talking about it a decade or more ago
money, control of education, control of communication, control of the voting procedure (and the candidates), etc
Do the people of the nation's in EU elect representatives in the UN?
no i dont think so
im pretty sure we dont
i should know