seriously object

to deploying a nuclear weapon against detroit

and can they even nuke the white house if trump supports gun rights?

I figure hed not be the only one to be able to authorise it, after all, he could be dead in certain circumstances

https://twitter.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1064511347273228289?s=20

The first amendment extends to civilian ownership of nuclear arms

its the second, but yes

its about being able to defend the country

oh

militias back then had artillery

it's not for defense

it's a beautiful artistic and political statement

a mushroom cloud is protected speech

well it doesnt HAVE to be for defence but according to the wording it would have to be sufficient for defence. Against other nations

yes you have the right unconditionaly but the reason is given.

the reason why that right exists

and back then private entities did own weapons way more powerful than beltfed turrets

such as battleships

with dozends of canons

The second amendment is explicitly for being armed well enough to resist and oppose a tyrannical domestic government, to defend against foreign is just a bonus

As well as home defense, hunting, sport shooting, etc, are all just pleasant additions to your ability to bear arms

And yeah, recreational nukes are to make a statement, not to overthrow anyone.
Plop one in the oceans as a metaphorical representation of how corporations treat the oceans via pollution.

This isn't the first time the american government has casually talked about nuking it's own citizens btw. There was an old statement by our goverment where the comteplated aerial bursts of nuclear weapons to shut down cities via EMP waves.

@The Ghost of Monarchies no, its explicitly to defend yourself on the global stage. *neccessary for the security of a free state "

something that bears a striking amount of common ground with UFO and aliens concepts

if that free state is threatened by foreign militaries, it should be sufficient to defend the state with it

lights in sky, engines and electronics dying, etc

Domestic tyrants threaten the free state, you know.

Sorry, I don't believe that the government is going to nuke it's citizens. The military would not follow that order.

if free state is threatened by other nations militaries it should be sufficient to defend the state

so, yes, it would include intercontinental missles

by the wording of it

It does reveal how psychopathic the gungrabbers are, though.

The thing is, plenty of people in the military would fight the government if it gave orders to hurt the citizens.

Also yeah if the government ordered the military against American Citizens, it'd immediately refuse and eat up those in the military that didn't refuse first

It'd cause immediate infighting

@Hiniku hence the globalist agenda, if not our military then this new EU gladly would. Or they would just provoke a mad response

There would be so much in fighting in a war where the government was ordering the military against us.

yeah

what i find funny is