Message from @paradigm
Discord ID: 515730179340107787
I suppose you would need a list of active operatives - so you know who to ignore
that would be a great list to have
We have a number of "whitelists" that we go by. Including a rather extensive whitelist for this platform and youtube as well. Tim is most certainly "whitelisted" otherwise I wouldn't even be here.
Tim seems legit
he's a genuine, normal person
There are a large number of people who are smeared by legacy media as "far-right reactionaries" and "agents of online radicalization" that neither my company, nor it's clients, think of in any way similarly.
Tim is great. I've followed Tim since 2011.
Occupy.
that was quite a show
Shitshow, maybe.
it did not seem to me that occupy had any genuine plan beyond protest
They didn't.
Occupy had a solid target to start with but got undermined by idpol
but I was also not very informed, so I could have missed the grand scheme
No plan could be formed because focus went to progstack
it never sounded like anything I could support
They didn't even have BASIC logistics set up in almost every location. Certainly the 6 different Occupy camps I checked out were more of a public health risk than a public safety risk.
"guys seriously stop writing anti-semitic things on the teleprompter"
I was also really (personally and subjectively) angry about Occupy's mistreatment and co-option of the Homeless community.
THAT made me sick to my stomach for weeks.
and they are more than willing to create a media spectacle when needed
"we have crazy people who will do shit"
it's like Bum Fights, but for politics
There is nothing more I despise than "politicised truth." I work in the realm of facts and fact-patterns and I don't have any use for "truth" much less "politicised truth."
I work in the realm of algorithms and protocols. And I think the First Amendment needs a protocol.
Op facts >_>
whenever there is expensive gun i want
i feel poor and underaged
People don't really understand how the 1st Amendment actually works in law and where the rubber meets the road. For instance, "Freedom of Speech" has neer applied on personally owned private property.
Indeed. But protocols do not require some third party platform.
what if u like
had a video camera on ur gun
That's what makes this whole online censorship debate so difficult. Is it a public forum? Or is it Private PRoperty? It can't be both.
Additionally, we were in very good shape to implement a protocol that more or less guaranteed uncensorable speech by 2001 - certainly by 2005. Instead, we poured billions into private platforms, and now we have a censorship problem.
<:anders6JeAoi:484408066750808064>
@paradigm I remember all of that. Saw where the direction was heading back then too. Is anyone here old enough to remember the 1995 "Cryptographer's Manifesto"?
Yes.
That document spelled it out rather clearly. Loquaciously, but clearly, nonetheless. Sometimes sound-bites are not the way to communicate critical information. It takes "War and Peace" to spell it out accurately.
1991 PGP (now ietf standard)
2001 BitTorrent (public domain)
2005 peer to peer ruled US traffic
you can guess what the obvious solution is