Or legal birth names only

Because its social media you have to take what people say at face value when they saw what there name is . Twitter is in no way going to verify if this is true so i can assume some troll will abuse this shit if aliases are taken at fCe value

@SantaSoc what about those gender fluid people that say im jhon and jane every 5 mins that would get people banned for deadnaming a imaginary character at a moments notice

Its all silly

What about multipersonality? Whose name are you to use?

Oh.... and a person can't become gender fluid but gender fluid can definitely become a person, lol

You know it is a little bit weird living with the amount of conditional identities as I do.
I have an internet name, an internet name under that internet name, a legal name, a full name,a psudo nickname that is used as my official name, & the name I use when ordering food.

Lol

I've come to terms with the fact that if I obtain any modicum of influence or fame, my psudeonym will collapse.

It's a little intimidating.

Especially considering my name is openly searchable on a particular administration website due to licenses I possess.

just think of the fun when 10 or 20 years from now some new form of super sjw will look up your old tweets to ruin your future life

My psudeonym, therefore, serves less as an impenetrable wall, and more as a gate I fully expect to be torn down if anyone really tried.

SJWs won't exist in 20 years, probalby not 10 eaither

Sjws have always existed.

Luckily I don't have real tweets under any name.

I posted to Postmstes once for help with an order... They have no support line, but their Twitter works as one for some reason...

SJWs have always existed but they've never been this loud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DI6rOj8IPs

If most of us watched this sketch when it was new (in the 90s) we would think most of this shit was exaggerated.

And other things would pass right by us.

But now you can recognize just how many buzzwords are in this script

"Appropriating"

I guess back then they said 'co-opt'

Same difference though.

Am I the only one who gets a pleasure from arguing with people in the comments section of clearly untrustworthy sources

Like vox some days or the root

I don't get pleasure from that.

I **would** if they ever admitted they were wrong when they get cornered.

In real life you can actually see someone the next day, and remind them how much they fucked up in a previous argument until they finally one day go "Okay look. YOU WERE RIGHT. NOW STOP"

On the internet

Off they go.

To the comfort of their echo chamber.

They can escape the truth forever.

Yeah, I wish they admitted they were wrong too

But I also link stuff if they ask for a source so I've changed more minds than most

But sometimes I think people ask for a source so they can "win" and they get mad when I actually go out of my way to help them

It's good for practice.

Against real people.

It's like a hologram battle.