primal only had the caveman thing going for it

AC games overated "templar man bad" "assasin man good" no morale grayness what so fucking ever

*true*

yeah because it's meant to be an allegory

thats why primal was good

it had cavemen

fun fact: cavemen make everything better

@Phalanxman we already have starwars for no moral grayness but the libtards ruined that in the last movie

flintstones, jetsons

also, there was definitely some moral ambiguity in a few of them

like the one set in Louisiana

or Unity

or AC3

unity was him helping the girl not the templars

although 3 was weak on it

in the extended universe where disney cant get its cancerous inflated mickey mouse hands on it, yeah, theres moral ambigiuty

His purpose morphed over time

the templars were all big bad in unity

yes but the Assassins were conflicted

It's irrelevant anyway because it's an allegory

(hmm, should i kill this guy or no)

thats assassin confusion

@Justin Burger (Major-GA) @Bland and Unoriginal Person all AC games gay except odeysey

I haven't playd it yet

@trainer of the sacred silcoon u r right lol

thanks

still allegory

assasins always downtalk templars and ignore their pleas and warnings

libtarded assasins

the assassins are right though

usually

2, 3 and Black flag are great, all after that get really fucking shit.

ill agree on 2 and blackflag

I really liked the third chronicles

odeysey is good other than that i agree

also rogue was good

eh

and the one set in victorian england

especially the DLC

rogue was just the same thing but templars became good guys

initiates was very boring imo