Message from @Graviter
Discord ID: 624476729007931392
Choosing wrong should be punished and advocated against
The state
The nation's appointed leader
Is it good for your people? Does it benefit your people?
And if (((they))) control the State?
Now you know what to base right and wrong on
Simple, coup
Good luck without any institutional power, no infrastructure and no real amount of resources
That's one of my biggest issues with a State having that much power. Right and good can be subjective, and someone's definition of good and moral can be wrong.
I.e. boomers saying "rock music leads to the breakdown of society"
Sometimes we think we operate from a position of power when we are among the least powerful at this point
Hence, specifically, strong leaders
Our leaders, symbols and paragons will be attacked on sight, if they can not be bought or stolen
We are ruled by the kids that were stuffed in lockers
I get that, but rarely does it work like that
Which is something we never do to the "other"
Which is a mistake
Attacking symbols, leaders and paragons is a great demoralizing thing
What if the leaders are retarded?
Like North Korea?
You have to stop thinking about leaders as politicians though
Or politicians as leaders
I haven't thought this out all too well yet
But here goes
There are leaders in all things
And we have great *potential* leaders
But those that occupy these positions in our "movement" or "thing" or "on the right" are usually obsessed with ego, profit or both
||clowns||
And will never defer or let anyone step in to take their place if they march faster or does a better job
Ego is our greatest problem
I fully believe voting rights should require some sort of exam
I fully believe that democracy and the republic should be binned
But then again I'm an edgy ethno-anarchist/tribal-oogaboogaman
Ruled by shamans?
That sounds pretty based
First foreigners should be stripped of all landownership within your territory. The right to own land should be reserved for your people alone. Then only people who own land should be qualified to vote, and then only if they are married (whether by state or not) and have children. One vote per household.
I guess there can be some clauses about widows and what not
Yeah a druidic council of wisewomen and sages > democracy 😏
That's my escapist daydream
That sounds nice bro
Like Arprim tribalism?