Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 517997226052812811
Basically, what Tom said.
In otherwords, if someone wanted to pay me to kill rye
I could accept because its unrestricted
Uhm, no.
Killing rye is regulating his ability to trade
lol, that'll confuse him a second, sched. 😛
But you cant regulate my ability to trade
Now you're changing the definition of free market AGAIN.
Plus you STILL haven't described what the "missing" market is that you keep pushing for your side of the discussion.
@Cody
In a free market
stop trying to regulate my ability to regulate your trade, this is a free market
This was z transaction made by me and the buyer
I just defined my terms beautifully. And you at least partially agreed.
Not rye
Can you explain the part of my scenario that was NOT free trade.
Wtf tom
How can you say this is a free market when you're regulating me codes?
That is literally the definition of a free market
How can you say it?
Unregulated
You're telling us that our definition isn't free market. But yours is.
If our system isn't free market, what market system is ours?
Answer that and you'll have a leg to stand on.
@Cody
Okay
I think I got this.
Let's solve this
Let me score another touch down here...
You say your not ancap
We could be discussing hamtaro lore, but instead we discuss this
So do you believe in regulation?
A Free Market does not give you the right to deprive another individual of liberty.
In such a case that it did, though, a Free Market would specifically allow a cheaper hitman to offer their services at a lower price.
If so, you believe in an economic policy BASED ON A free market
Codes why do you keep saying you're allowed to regulate the market so that it can't be regulated?
If not, you believe in a free market
What I said was true within your own choice of definition.
You keep describing a market that is not free
At this point, Codes is kinda like the Laura Loomer situation.
He knows he's wrong, and everyone is just teasing him for how wrong he is, but he'll stay handcuffed to that door until he pisses himself.
Actually I'm completely correct
But Laura Loomer was unironically right