@DrYuriMom interesting.

Roe rules that the government could not interfere with the private provider-patient relationship

A right to privacy is the entire basis for Roe, and one of the reasons I counsel caution to my right-inclined friends when they argue Roe should be overturned

I don't think this is provider-patient though. This would be much more of a generic right to privacy case regarding private property.

There's also a clear 2nd amendment element.

It's still a matter of privacy.

This is much closer to that FBI iPhone unlocking case a year ago.

Sure, but I wouldn't base my defense on Roe.

amongst voters... clinton got more votes.... so technically wasnt she the "populist candidate"

I think Roe could be invoked to argue that unless a subpoena is obtained, and that requires a crime already have occurred, that government accessing your private information is unconstituional

I don't know if 2nd Amendment would protect your right to privacy. This would be about accessing your private information. The decision to permit the gun or not would come later.

Wasn't there some people saying hillary has less votes than trump if you subtract the fake votes from the total?

There's a 2a case here too. It involves licensing and could be used to deny the right.

There's a difference between populist, popular, and vote majority @wacka

A *Roe* defense would make heads spin, but it seems a bit of a stretch imo.

Yeah but it's already been ruled that gun licenses do not impede your 2a rights

There is quite literally no evidence of "millions of fake votes"

In the most recent election, the Dem House votes outnumbered the Repub House votes by 53 million to 45 million

so what is it that makes trump populist

specifically amongst people that actually voted

With how courts and legislators have gradually eroded the second amendment rights, I don't see any reason to believe a Roe defense would work.

Jerbs

Also, Democratic house representation is about their vote share or slightly above it. So gerrymandering isn't favoring the Republicans this time around.

Sent in my feedback on there

Same.

I didnt vote in the midterms

The idea that you can just mandate people turn over social media is bothersome to me.

The 2 people to vote for ducked ass

Trying to think of what I wanted to talk about at first...

I think it was either the patriot law that passed under bush

https://www.britannica.com/event/Roe-v-Wade

Are you talking about something similar to article 13?

"In a majority opinion written by Justice Harry A. Blackmun, the court held that a set of Texas statutes criminalizing abortion in most instances violated a woman’s constitutional right of privacy, which it found to be implicit in the liberty guarantee of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (“…nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”)."

What about the babys constitutional rights to being alive?

Or letting civilians have a larger access to military force so it wouldn't be nearly as hard to stop a tyranical government

Didn't one of the justices come out saying after the fact that they conjured something out of air to justify their finding in favor of abortion?

No, they didn't

" In his opinion, Blackmun noted that only a “compelling state interest” justifies regulations limiting “fundamental rights” such as privacy and that legislators must therefore draw statutes narrowly “to express only the legitimate state interests at stake.”"

Abortion is a horrible horrible thing

No argument

But tyranny is too