Who are you to say i dont

what if mortality is a simluation

the simluation says

Mortality/=morality

@SantaSoc depends on what you mean by "Who" and "you"

Tfw abel tryna debate a joke

Clean yo room

Cheese your room

Roon

I was also using a joke lmao

Macaroons

🤔

Rangoon?

Macroon Morality

Mancoons

Manbuns

but anyone care that 200 congressmen are suing trump for staying in his hotel :')

He'll still have more money left over

@SantaSoc no, did you hear about the guy that sued apple for having a patent to "voice commucation"

lol

If there's anyone who needs more exposure, it's Candice Owens

i thought it was pretty funny

guy sued samsung too rofl

he patented phones in 2010

Like a boss

punks4trump must be writing a fkin essay

jesus

@Abel true to a degree, not all of them though. You can be kind in accordance to a system of ethics, too. And setting a few basic premises (ethics are similar to math in that regard, except there is one specific form of math which works representing the real world, not that other forms of math would be less valid but they would be less useful) runs a far smaller risk of discriminatory behaviour. Most people would find it hard to limit whos fate has to be considered a priori, they would want to establish to themselves that there is a good reason for it. Thus, if you say the wellbeing of sentient beings is relevant, that includes everyone. You could still argue about wether it would be good to kill low IQ people to achieve more but since that could hit a relative of you thats unlikely to be accepted en masse.

Rip essay

and that killing low iq people is only possible to argue for under some assumptions about the result and some ethical systems.

I just posted that vid earlier @Redneo because it was similar to the topic of judicial review.

@SantaSoc shit is wild dude https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AB633rlUkg

they just sue everyone all the time for no reason

fuckin people and their sueing shit

ethical hedonism for instance wouldnt allow that becouse not only is net-pleasure what is valued but freedom for everyone to do stuff that doesnt directly harm anyone also is.

thats the most important part, actualy

Suing was a waying to counter unfair situations, now people take advantage of it.

if you made people donate blood each time they sued people less lawsuits would be filed.

most of these suits are done thru dummy corps they wont donate blood. lol

Donate cash

well you kinda do donate cash