It was getting frustrating to me trying to explain this to them.

? No harm no foul? I didn't even realize you were annoyed @Dusty Morgan

Would it be possible to fight back against mob rule by removing the vote from all women who haven't served in the military?

> *A seven-year-old boy who reviews toys has been revealed as YouTube's highest-earning star, raking in $22m (£17.3m).*
This succinctly demonstrates the obvious outcome of YouTube's aggressive content policing.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46427910

That just changes the mob

No. And that wouldn't be fair anyway @Malt_Hitman

@Dusty Morgan so let’s say this; what if 90% of the American public all agreed to elimination of prostitution, and could pass a amendment; would that be sufficient for you?

no. that will create a revolt if you try to take away the right to vote

might be easier to use their own rules against them and to make them fight against each other in their intersectional wars

The money WILL dry up eventually

Even if you disagreed on it

Toy reviews make big bucks because child audiences are very susceptible to advertising.

And watch videos over and over again

That is what Mob Rule is.

turns the trans and feminists against each other by highlighting certain tweets

That is why we got representatives.

Majority of citizens live in cities.

@Dusty Morgan are your telling me you oppose amendments?

While rural area would be neglected and abused.

I am opposed of making it so easy that we can completely change or trample on other's rights through voting.

intersectional can make each section of it compete for the highest rung in the oppression olympics. Play that up like highlander (there can be only one) as they all fight for the gold medal of victimhood

90% is more than a diverse set of opinions

Then you need to completely rewrite the constitution, Dusty.

Correction, that's why representatives are based on geography and not calculated proportionally. @Dusty Morgan

That’s almost everyone

That means the 10% aka minority will be oppressed.

Yeah. That's how voting works.

The minority doesn't get their way.

What 10% minority? Like, (((Jews))) or something like that?

What if we decide to vote to wipe out a certain race, no race in particular and it receives 90% of the vote?

Then the amendment passes.

And then we go about killing all that race.

Because the laws don't care about what the amendment says.

Yeah, I guess we do.

Basically that is mob rule.

That's the Constitution.

I'm not so convinced.

You're saying the constitution is mob rule.

I am getting super frustrated Pratel, please take over.

*Sighs...* I am dealing with fucking withdrawals, makes it hard to think..

Mob rule would be more like the 51% storms through town, suppresses everyone's votes and gains power. It's more like, the president gets elected 71% and then 2 years later is sitting at 30% with everyone rioting in the streets.