no, bush was a puppet

referring to theories that the plane jet fuel could not have cause the towers to collapse because it doesnt burn hot enough

yeah that is true

scientifically

it is a very dumb defense to say that jet fuel was enough

the counter argument is of course that fire cant melt it but can soften it, therefore nothing about 9/11 was suspicious

but if it was merely softened it would have spilled sideways or warped beforehand

but it fell all at once in freefall which is a collapse like in demolision

there were also people saying they heard explosions

detonated thermite

I imagine once a floor plus the weight of the floors above it starts moving down the momentum will overcome what ever remaining strength there is in the building

Roses are red
You're not going to Heaven
Violets are blue
And Bush did 9/11

riiiight brant

that doesnt even rhyme, @Swedishmafia101 ;P

so the weight of all the floors above cause the collapse of un-damaged floors below

yet that is the point of the structure, to support that weight

No u

to the structure holding the floors, yes

nope

fuck it

the structure is designed to hold the weight yes, not the momentum of that weight as it comes down

especially not after weakened by fire and impact shock

sure

no

only the upper floors were weakened

yeah i share ixtigers tinfoil here, but i spent years arguing with people about it so i dont find it very stimulating anymore

same

it's really obvious and i'm tired of it

it's been nearly 20 years

resulting in failure of the structure around those floors, so total weight of the floors that collapse plus the weight of the floors above cause increased momentum and shock energy , if the structure has already been weakened by fire I really fail to see why this is considered dubious by a minority

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash

so did we make a building that couldn't survive a plane crash

or did this plane on 9/11 just get a critical hit

the point of the building was to have a spine that would hold all the floors attached.

for them all to fall would take strategic placement of thermite at each floor

that is how demolitions happen

well i can tell you why we find it suspicious, but im not gonna debate it. the collapse seems to follow the path of most resistance, which is a physics mind fuck, and the other mind fuck is that the lighter part of the building can crush the stronger, bigger and more reinforced part of the building all the way to the ground. but yeah theres plenty of counter arguments to this, and revised nist studies which is being disputed back and forth and so on.

no

it makes sense when you don't know what the fuck you are talking about

but the building is literally meant to withstand this shit