Brb sorry

he makes the case that there were a number of threats to his life in association with the events, and his security detail being weird and bailing out on him and such

are we now into muh jet fuel territory?

for example his security detail were just letting him sit there and read the goat novel to the kids in the middle of this instead of immediately moving him to safety, and instead putting all those kids at risk

he has this frightened deer in headlights look in that footage

and you can see in a wikileaks pager dump that they got a threat to air force one saying "angel is next", angel being the code word for air force one

the theory is that was a threat from insiders who know the code word for air force one, to threaten the president, and not from terrorist hijackers

and his fighter jet escort was delayed, so he didn't have that protection for a while in his plane

i have no interest in defending bush, i think he's a war criminal, but i get the sense that he didn't have much control during the events

what is muh jet fuel

no, bush was a puppet

referring to theories that the plane jet fuel could not have cause the towers to collapse because it doesnt burn hot enough

yeah that is true

scientifically

it is a very dumb defense to say that jet fuel was enough

the counter argument is of course that fire cant melt it but can soften it, therefore nothing about 9/11 was suspicious

but if it was merely softened it would have spilled sideways or warped beforehand

but it fell all at once in freefall which is a collapse like in demolision

there were also people saying they heard explosions

detonated thermite

I imagine once a floor plus the weight of the floors above it starts moving down the momentum will overcome what ever remaining strength there is in the building

Roses are red
You're not going to Heaven
Violets are blue
And Bush did 9/11

riiiight brant

that doesnt even rhyme, @Swedishmafia101 ;P

so the weight of all the floors above cause the collapse of un-damaged floors below

yet that is the point of the structure, to support that weight

No u

to the structure holding the floors, yes

nope

fuck it

the structure is designed to hold the weight yes, not the momentum of that weight as it comes down

especially not after weakened by fire and impact shock

sure

no

only the upper floors were weakened

yeah i share ixtigers tinfoil here, but i spent years arguing with people about it so i dont find it very stimulating anymore

same

it's really obvious and i'm tired of it

it's been nearly 20 years

resulting in failure of the structure around those floors, so total weight of the floors that collapse plus the weight of the floors above cause increased momentum and shock energy , if the structure has already been weakened by fire I really fail to see why this is considered dubious by a minority