that is hypocritical

well it doesn't actually

there is this thing

called Logging out

and boom, you can see his page.

you just can't REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE at him

but cannot reply

it was directly including posting to his page

it is freedom of speech

i.e. the freedom to REEEEEEEE

not just reading, they included posting to his page under that federal ruling

There is nothing in Freedom of Speech that say you are able to REEEEEEE at the president directly.

in a public forum?

sure there is

You can still say the things you want to say

you just can't ping his phone.

http://news.ufl.edu/articles/2018/05/federal-judge-rules-trumps-twitter-account-is-a-public-forum.php

Well that judge is wrong.

by that standard

twitter was on the judge's side

yes

any citizen should be able to get direct access to the Oval Office for a 1 on 1 meeting

the ruling put twitter in the position they wanted to be in, short term

because if they deny that you are denying access to the president.

freedom of speech does not require access

but

in a public forum, you are free to speak

so anyone that cannot post onto trump's page is considered twitter violating the 1st amendment, that means all bannings are against the law now

which is why this ruling is shit 😛

It isn't a constitutional ruling

it is a political one.

so trump would not be compelled to maintain a twitter account
but if he does, it is a public forum, and people are entitled to speak there

ALL people are

and him blocking people

does not infringe on their ability to speak

they can scream into the Aether all they want.

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Subscribestar (exclusive Discord rewards available):
<https://www.subscribestar.com/Timcastt>

the 1st amendment in a public square doesn't just apply to progressives after all

^

It is just a double standard