proper-ethiquette for money i'd say

plain and simple

You've already lost.

No i havent

The issue with being too absolute and aggressive with what you say is that people will end up rushing to the other extreme due to it.

Imo

"Projectile devices"

my revenue is up

google calls me on the phone every month

Pathetic.

Lost what though?

and I get to defend speech and liberty

You're their pet.

And youre not even making arguments now

Atkins is right, a model of total PC compliance is no free speech channel.

"I'm not gonna promote patreon, but will still get money for those on it"

"You're their pet"

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

You're bragging about how much money you make and how much google loves you.

That's pathetic.

So go out in a blaze of glory

And you're literally just insulting him?

burn yourself down

As if strategy is a bad thing

I have to stand with Tim here. You trade off like 1% of your speech on one platform. ONE. And get massive profits. And you still make videos that defend free speech

theres no point in swearing, theres no point in racial slurs

You don't have a strategy except doing what the people censoring you want.

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

And maximizing your income.

i believe Communists used this strategy in WW2

Just send hordes of unarmed yelling people until you reach the enemy line, or their bullets run out

Be aggressive until you either destroy the platform or they kick you off

Isn't that what the brits used in ww2 too?

So what's the long-term strategy to own the censors, Tim? Does this approach even have one?

Get soldiers to march at the germans

thats WW1 for brits

Use more people then there are bullets

to be honest I didnt even noticed you stop swearing 😄

Youre just mad that I dont like your association idea

you got so sour when I said no

@AmamiRiku It's what they used in WW1

I don't notice swears

Mb, I got the two mixed up it seems