But when was the legal precedent that established it?

Because for legality that is more important than the law used

Well no a precedent affects all of the past, too

since whenever the law on the basis it is set existed

Well no one challanged it so it was never associated with Same Sex Marriages despite being passed in 1868

The government shouldn't be involved in marriage at all

yeah i agree, marriage should be abolished

Marriage is dumb

^

Well honestly

marriage was abolished ever since numbnuts decided that "marital rape" is anything but an oxmoron

marriage is not only consent, it used to be the only valid form of consent

I met a homosexual couple that cited that as reason for why they refused to sign a gay marrriage ammendment

Just because you marry someone doesn't me you have unlimited and unrestricted access to your body

If your wife doesn't want to have sex with you, that doesn't make it ok for you to force yourself on her

yeah actualy if she doesnt right now thats fine if she never does thats against the established contract

Also, domestic violence is a thing, and domestic sexual violence is also a thing.

Then you get a divorce for said reason, you don't force yourself on them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgj4K_4uhlA

but tim it was just this one time antifa did dat

Well you try and get a divorce with her at fault for that reason

go ahead

Tim live

There is a tim pool feed channel, we don't need it linked in here.

See, thats the issue

Not everyone sees that

Not the concept of marital rape

if it is live

but the divorce courts and alimony

whereas if a man doesnt put out, well, withholding affection is recognised as domestic abuse

Also it isn't in there

https://youtu.be/NTmKoOt7dE4
Kyle kulinski defends sargon

our boyfriend's live 😮

uh oh

not surprised really @byathy

watching meow

just like jimmy dore defended Alex Johnes

OMG SARGON IS A RACIST NAZI REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I never knew kyle and sargon have did streams before

Together

That is