Theists don't even agree on a definition of god

How do you know it isn't

I'm bored. o:

@Scribblehatch I'm not going to let it slide

he's scared

You're boring me.

scribblle.

you can't debate so you leave

bye

look

No.

then join vc

I will look at nothing.

three times in a row whenever someone demands a debate, you bail

I can't join vc

Sorry

am i supposed to say that scribble can't debate?

@Gilgamesh exactly

Will have to debate like this

@Rouqen all good

@Rouqen I'll teach you the truth

Also

Did you know

You need eyes to study eyes

Yes

Fully

@mateitheking proof there is such a thing as "the truth".

^

@DanteMenace they are talking about existence again reee

rouqen are you saying you can't hypothesize godhood without being a god

where?

Here

Scroll up

they're talking about solipsism again reeeee

Truth is what is
if I kick you in the nuts and we have an objective observer

it's truth that I kicked you In the nuts

god is a concept of a manlike being that possesses great power. If you are a man, you can hypothesize manx10000000 @Gilgamesh

your point @mateitheking

But the reason can be variating based on the observer

@Rouqen i disagree. I don't think god is manlike

@mateitheking an observer by definition cant be objective

Yeah yeah