Message from @mateitheking
Discord ID: 524887455258902528
They don't vote with reason
thats not exclusive to wamen though
Yes
I want to bring back the old ways of voting in the usa
as well as that not all women do, granted in general they're more emotional
Men who own property
Men for the reason part
property for the reasonable part
double reason
So what about women who are proven to be reasonable? and they own property?
Well in the old USA if you own property and you were a white wahmen you could vote
I also believe you have to be married
but don't quote me
they could vote
then
fair enough, lets define property in this case
Agree
what would you define property as?
Cuz that can range from a strip of land, to a building/house, to a phone, to a car, to the belt that holds up your pants
there is a word for that
it's not coming to mind
well just describe what you mean, for the sake of argument
real property
So a person would be allowed to vote if they have atleast, a house on a certain sized strip of land?
that's the word
yes
Basically so you can't be a poor person voting for welfare
poor person = crack head
fair enough, but what if you have a rich person/company, buying lots of land, dividing it up, placing a minimum required shack there, and selling it to people, on the condition they vote what the rich person want?
thereby locking out the other voters
anonymous voting
they wouldn't find out
also I'm fine with that
well you don't need to care for anonymous voting, just give a row of immigrants/protesters of the same side property
so you can swing the vote in your favor
they are Voluntarily having person vote for them
they can make that choice
true, but they can influence it,
By buying like 1,000 sq kilometers of land,
And giving 1,000 people the vote
As opposed to a farmer who can't do the same, thus creating a voting gap of roughly 1:1000
Electoral college
founder fathers already thought that up
but thats per state