well in theory anyway

there is a futility on apply rules and restrictions on an age demographic that is predisosed to rebelling and disregarding authority.

Im all for baseline laws (18+) with abilities to opt out

Like drivers ed

you can do something if you take a (shitty) government course on autonomy

can be a school extracarricular

well if you're in the USA, the 26th (?) ammendment pretty much locks the age of majority at 18

there is a complication from all the computer tech we've applied in the workforce

it's made the entry level jobs of old redundant

so the younger generations will need more and more specialised training, and on going training

or even retraining depending on the sector

Im cool with that

Im glad im not a farmer

lol

you mean "agricultural engineer"?

Im a software dev, so there is plenty of great enginnering in ag

lots if IOT to be done

Im just hoping that society is able to keep up with tech advancement

i'd argue that it's not keeping up with it

even now

yeah

lots of health issues just because of smartphones

blue light delaying sleep, interrupting normal and healthy social interaction

not to mention the political polarisation

still though, happy days.

Yeah unemployment will be coming in huge waves soon

Just hope its small enough that society can absorb the hit

probably.

The tucker/ben shapiro argument was good

but still left a lot undiscussed

which argument was that?

Range of topics, but mostly the arrival of self driving tech

and if the gov't should interfere

self driving tech probably isn't going to happen as soon as it's being alluded to.

it's nowhere near road safe yet

Well, AI is helping

autonomous AI?

I think the development will start to rapidly snowball

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/22/black-journalists-denounce-lack-of-diversity-in-newsrooms

`there is much more progress to be made`