or is it?

dunno much about economics

nah its ideal on paper

Government runs normally, the people run normally

But in times of crisis, you essentially flip a switch, and government gets absolute authority so they can instantly make changes to solve said "crisis"

But that would require an incorruptable government, cuz in reality with every fascist state,
Instead of solving said crisis, they just keep on "crisis" mode and just control everyones lives

i’m gonna say the n word

no?

no as the n word xD

i'd say China is ultimately a fascist state rather than communist

Cuz in times of crisis, China can just say to a company "we need your money for war" and just take said money

nigger

well i believe morals are subjective, which makes rights subjective, in my mind, but if you establish and define how private property is rightfully acquired through reason and philosophy, then what is private or not should not be subjective

OOOoOoOoH

but the things od reason and order are mostly right wing oriented

rights aren't rights, they're privileges

Cuz your rights can be taken away

well yeah

i take the word more literally than most people
i think rights are everything which isn't wrongs

the only rights you have are the right to defend yourself

everything you are in the right when you do

and i believe only negative rights are real rights
i dont think i believe in positive rights

btw i dont understand why should someone have right to migrate to other country ... if that was pass (which probably is) there we will be global sickness soon becouse unhealthy people will be movin from country to country and soo on

you should have the right to migrate

said country however should have the right to refuse you and kick you out

i heard in australia you cant defend yourself

how so

and yes, that "human right" to migrate has passed in the marrakesh agreement of this month

they aren’t allowed self defence?

no

it is really hard to self defense

without going to jail after succesfull self defense

its prolly the same as European law,

they're only allowed to defend themselves in life-threatening situations

if a person is invading your home but not harming you physically, you're not allowed to defend your property

as in -> If you come into my home and start taking my money and phone, i'm not allowed to break your legs

thats why you put landmines on your property, so if they get killed they did it to themselves

I have to either
- Chase burglar off
- Call cops to handle it
- distract them long enough for cops to arrest them

man i dont want to have land mines l my property

or you pull a home alone and plant large nails

well there was a story that 2 intruders went into a veterana house but only one got out alive cus one got in a fight with the veteran

veteran vent to jail

dude I have an idea

Death wish 2]

yeah theres plausible deniability with large nails, you could claim that you just accidentally left them there
but i heard of a burglar suing their victim because they got injured when they tried to rob them
so theres probably nothing you can do

i'm not surprised,

by law i'm not allowed to lock them in my own home for cops to come,

i'll be infringing on their rights to leave my property

Paul kersey get caught and deported from america

he goes to the UK

well if you can't lock up criminals, that means cops have more rights than non-cops
which is anti-equality