lol that works too

Now we're talking.

but someone will file a un report and the findings will see that the report is false

lol

I was accused of being a Nazi last week.

good

just get the skulls of dead ISIS soldiers

and a week after a caravan, send a truck of skulls back to that country of origin of the caravan

Weeeee!

https://tenor.com/view/goodjob-clap-nicework-great-gif-7248435

nazi can be obsess with the occult

You lost a hand in a car wreck, here is 50G to go to Honduras and tell them that a US BPS dog bit it off.

lo

actually i wonder

He called me a Nazi, but I just stuffed that Jewish bastard back into the oven. That's what he gets for insulting me.

is there a law where u can go after media in latin america for spreading false informationn

lol poor jew

Yes, you can sue people in other countries for defamation.

they are contributing to illegal immigration

Ehhhh, you have to go country by country and see what their laws are

It might not even have to be in their jurisdiction.

If they publish it in the US, as the Sargon case, you can sue them there.

But in the US libel and Incitment are really hard to win

People went forum shopping like that a lot, though.

The UK was a very plaintiff friendly jurisdiction for defamation, which is why a lot of such cases were filed there.

It depends on the case how hard it is to win.

It also depends on who is being defamed under US law.

You will have to prove malice for a public figure.

Some Judges will now try to call the Covington High kids public figures now, which hurts the the kids case that they were lied about.

Judges?

Not sure if that's who's trying it.

Judges decide Motions to Dismiss

I guess, but I am not sure one follows from the other.

Just because you are a public figure does not mean you cannot be defamed.

Also, it seems like a nonsensical argument because if a person becomes public by nature of the allegations, everybody would qualify as a public person and the distinction would be rendered moot.

what public figure? what was their jobs? being a student and going to a field trip is not being public figure

Kathy Grifith posted calls for violence, Kids sue Kathy, Kathy calls for a motion to dismiss on grounds what she said was free speach and not incitemant or Slander, then the Judge has to rule to continue.

Good

The legal language used is typically someone who "thrusts himself into the public sphere".

Sue that bitch

The boys would not qualify as such. There is precedence that clearly contradicts this.

Maybe Twitter needs some accountability here