Message from @LokiReap
Discord ID: 540269873880760353
they try not to teach it
I would say, for a 100 years.
I just keep my mouth shut and move away from any convo like that in public
Ernest Belfort Bax was one of the first to write about it.
cuck
Nope protecting my job. I dont need a sexual harrasement claim
standard is different in the military
they would have to prove it
no they wouldnt. Standard is much lower. as long as youre more likely than not to have commited a crime you are guilty by the UCMJ
People think SJWs are a new thing, when the origins of this go back to the Victorian Age.
I think the UCMJ uses a preponderance of the evidence standard.
Most of the time, it's just whatever the hell the judge feels like.
Pretty much. Even if the evidence is clearly the opposite way it can be ignored
Yes, I have seen that many, many times, in various context.
They love doing this in family court.
Most of the time, the judge has not read the submissions of the defense.
Title IX tribunals are no different.
And the military has greatly changed its gender dynamics.
But, personally I think the army in particular has been gynocentric for a while now.
Pretty much. This is why i keep my head down and mouth shut. Im an E-6 so im just waiting for my medical seperation to be processed and get out
If there are allegations of DV, they usually rush in to throw the serviceman under the bus.
Yeap Navy got this way after the Tailhook scandal
**stvx#4279** just left the server.
"scandal"
Everything is a scandal nowadays.
In hindsight it's always overblown.
This was back in the 90s
Yes, but they are very selective in their memory.
It's whatever suits their narrative that will be remembered.
misremembered rather
Theres no way
And then the extreme cases become what sets the standard for all cases.
HAHAHAHA youre wrong
SHARP exists for a reason
Prove it then
Talking about Las Vegas, the FBI concluded Paddock had "no particular motive".
"i was bored lol" paddock, probably