no you didn't

Okay

Feel free to scroll up

Maybe you think you did, but you didn't.

^

Then tell me how I didn't

Instead of making statements

tell you how you didn't do something?

can't prove a negative

Wow

You must know the negative

So what is it

You don't have any answer and you don't understand so you just deny I had one

Fuck

Well, I mean, I could explain 2 by saying Five, but that doesn't really explain anything...

I guess we hit the deadend

So what else is new

I am not being snarky I am saying obviously we're not moving forward on this so what else is going on

I'm still wondering what the goal of the train meme is.

That's between you two

It's a black and white fallacy however

There is always another option

If I turned the train to kill one I commit murder

If I left the train to kill 5 I am implicit

It's bullshit to convince you that evil is necessary somehow

Evil is retarded

But I'm not getting through to two nihilists

the train thing is not a fallacy it's an analogy for when there is a choice to make that leads only to bad outcomes and your ability to rationalize evil as the "lesser evil", which means that morality is relative to the situation and not bound to pure logic

I'm not sure I am a nihilist.

Why can't you stop the train

disproving the idea of real evil and real good

What's the bad outcome? What if my goal is to get to work on time?

Why can't you bring the people off the tracks

Can i make the train hit both people?

If i still make it on time, what does 6 ppl dying matter to that goal?

that's bargaining, and that doesn't solve anything. don't you understand the point of an allegory ?

So, again, what's the goal?

If one is that fucking late that they can only move a train to one end before there is time to save anyone then you should move it to where there are less casualties

But wait

What if the five people were pedophiles

life isn't all sweet, sometimes you have to make choice (and not acting is still a choice) that lead only to bad outcomes