meaning ppl can have more or spend monies on other things, like a turd someone called art.

But yeah who knows

True.

Lmao

Even then automation is iffy maybe for socialism.

Cheap as hell and really good quality thanks to robots!!! sounds too good to be true

There is still chance of corruption for the people that run the robots.

Lmao

Sometimes i feel like the world is overcrowded

You're not going to get to that stage by redistributing first

It is

Not overpopulated though.

There is a difference between the 2.

But you get what I am saying guys?

Then you're a proto Marxist, aka a Hegelian, first capitalism and then socialism

If there was a model of socialism that did work, it would have to be under complete automation

but even then it's a stretch

I do not support socialism.

**white devil#5876** just left the server.

@BlueAndBlack thats what Sargom seems to be

Kind of...

Sargon is fairly sensible

I do not support socialism.

I am doing a thought experiment, wondering if there is any way socialism would work.

Good

It's better than crying about it

Lol

And the moment, socialism has to many bodies under it.

He believes through capitalism well have enough resources and capital to natually develop a form of socialistic society kinda makes sense

Maybe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbllBjlu8Pk

Basically non revolutionary Marxism

lol

Ironically... only minor success for social is support by Captalism.

Maybe.

non revolutionary marxism is a myth

Kind of... Hegel and Plato made these theories first

Social Security Income, Food Stamps, and Medicare.

Those are socialist programs.

That might be how we adapt in to it tbh

Those programs ARE supported by Capitalism.