agree

in group stuff? or ingroup and outgroup?

consistent reasoning, as the non aggression principle is attempting

so if killing pedos is okay you need a consistent framework of principles for that

👁one hundered thousand billion quintupintillion precent agree

arrived at from reason and philosophy, not arbitrary emotion based opinion

quintupintillion

you are talking about creating a list of checkmars @NativeInterface

So if someone looks at a child a funny way, we can murder them right?

thats three hundred and two zeroes

If you're buying a single ticket as an adult to see disney on ice then, yeah

gulag

Well you can have a complex moral framework you know? just because you find murder wrong doesnt mean there are no exceptions

then, yeah

Im fine with that @Phioux

what i don't like about the people who think all pedos should be killed is this: what if they're not a pedo?

i want sand

eat sand

Do you have a framework at all if it's too flexible?

yes

Then murder is wrong is not a fact but this statement has more impact on peoples lives do than some facts

here you go https://res.cloudinary.com/dk-find-out/image/upload/q_80,w_1920,f_auto/Sand_Dunes_23_4_13_qn3vac.jpg

👁 agree 💯%

killing people can be justified

only fools speak in absolutes

and then it's not murder

👁👍💯%

anything can be justified.

true

@Strufa but that's an absolute ...

So its the first logic law

https://tenor.com/view/kids-predicaments-beach-sand-gif-3462944

how am i still pleb if im normie

well, try justifying it with consistent reasoning and philosophy at least, rather than random emotions

why am i still pleb but i am normie

🤔

👃

i dont understand the topic, anything needs to weigh in its context

everything is contextual

k

so talk about context