do i get double pwnage points then?

exactly

can i be the successor to ben shapiro?

he's the daywalker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_mvpGAm8us

i would prefer it if people had consistent moral frameworks even if they have subjective foundation

100% exactly

@NativeInterface consistent how/

ok, but how to apply survival of the fittest ... where?

internally?

one hundered thousand billion quintupintillion precent

agree

in group stuff? or ingroup and outgroup?

consistent reasoning, as the non aggression principle is attempting

so if killing pedos is okay you need a consistent framework of principles for that

👁one hundered thousand billion quintupintillion precent agree

arrived at from reason and philosophy, not arbitrary emotion based opinion

quintupintillion

you are talking about creating a list of checkmars @NativeInterface

So if someone looks at a child a funny way, we can murder them right?

thats three hundred and two zeroes

If you're buying a single ticket as an adult to see disney on ice then, yeah

gulag

Well you can have a complex moral framework you know? just because you find murder wrong doesnt mean there are no exceptions

then, yeah

Im fine with that @Phioux

what i don't like about the people who think all pedos should be killed is this: what if they're not a pedo?

i want sand

eat sand

Do you have a framework at all if it's too flexible?

yes

Then murder is wrong is not a fact but this statement has more impact on peoples lives do than some facts

here you go https://res.cloudinary.com/dk-find-out/image/upload/q_80,w_1920,f_auto/Sand_Dunes_23_4_13_qn3vac.jpg

👁 agree 💯%

killing people can be justified

only fools speak in absolutes

and then it's not murder

👁👍💯%

anything can be justified.

true

@Strufa but that's an absolute ...