Why is it more important to judge what is said by "who it divides" than whether it is true?

It would probably be divisive for me to say to get rid of welfare, yet, I think it is right to say it, because it's true.

In fact Canada and the UK are further along that pole than the US.

and the URSS is to blame

By the same logic, you can be united behind a cause that is absolutely disastrous.

Russia is to blame for everything

Because in Venezuela those who used that rethoric were the bad guys

so im going to jump the gun and say who are the bad guys in america

The only reason the US isn't as far along that pole is because of the 1st Amendment.

What use is it to be "not divided", i.e. "united", if what you are united behind is some idiotic socialist policy that will leave your country in ruins?

Better have some division over the issue.

and the 2nd Amendment.

@Strufa 95% of the population growth in democrat run areas are by migrants and they support complete socialist governments as an example. They are very hard core leftists and are dragging the rest of the democrats to the extreme left

USA as hated as it is, its a bastion that represents a lot of things for the world

https://youtu.be/92LK-OsNJk0

The coded language of "causing division" is a complete red herring.

Latinos support populism and socialism

thats the problem of LatAm

Yes, so if they are united behind that, does it make it good?

and why i hate this continent so much

They want messiahs that fix they world for them

that give them free shit

Yes.

But due to this rise in leftist ideology has given rise to the division between socialists and non-socialists.

And you can "unite" a lot of people behind that. Jesus Christ, if that is what people were uniting behind, you better HOPE there is some division left.

Jesus Christ.

Division is necesary for the debate of ideas

however too much and it creates a fracture

I'm not sure what that means.

a lack of division is an echo chamber

Really?

yup

Is there any division in this channel over what the speed of light is?

sociology is not science

Is there division over the Earth not being flat?

What does it matter for the principle?

We are talking about qualia

You are playing word games.

people have subjetive views of the world

Oh I agree, people should not be going straight for authoritarian socialism, but there shouldn't be so much division that people can't even have a conversation without getting butthurt because something didn't click with their ideas.

Show me what the difference is.

those views conflict with others

as long as 2 humans exist divison will exist thas the nature of survival