Classic liberals cared about the working class. Not the modern liberals.

It's always the same. It's what Thomas Sowell calls the class of the anointed.

The left wants to favor non whites over whites
the right wants to favor whites over non whites
so what are you going to do?
your going to join US!

Modern liberals sit on the left pole, which isn't the case with classic liberals.

THE CENTRIST AND REVITALIZATION PARTY

just take away the "Poor" and "Marginal" for "Black" "Women" "Islamics" and "Burgesy" "Rich" for "Patriarchy" and "White males"

exactly the same rethoric

@Strufa our democrats as a whole have gone that fucking insane where soon even carl marx will be viewed as far right..... and the thing is that the migrants they rely on to make their new voter base are at their most conservative more liberal then the current population ( those hondurans REALLY support socialism for example)

and guess what?

The most discriminatory institutions tend to be public ones. Market incentives usually put a price tag on people's ability to discriminate in the private sector.

that rethoric divided our country

so yeah with experience im pretty sure the left is to blame for the divide

It is the same rhetoric dividing America right now.

And Canada.

And the UK.

The west is falling

Why is it more important to judge what is said by "who it divides" than whether it is true?

It would probably be divisive for me to say to get rid of welfare, yet, I think it is right to say it, because it's true.

In fact Canada and the UK are further along that pole than the US.

and the URSS is to blame

By the same logic, you can be united behind a cause that is absolutely disastrous.

Russia is to blame for everything

Because in Venezuela those who used that rethoric were the bad guys

so im going to jump the gun and say who are the bad guys in america

The only reason the US isn't as far along that pole is because of the 1st Amendment.

What use is it to be "not divided", i.e. "united", if what you are united behind is some idiotic socialist policy that will leave your country in ruins?

Better have some division over the issue.

and the 2nd Amendment.

@Strufa 95% of the population growth in democrat run areas are by migrants and they support complete socialist governments as an example. They are very hard core leftists and are dragging the rest of the democrats to the extreme left

USA as hated as it is, its a bastion that represents a lot of things for the world

https://youtu.be/92LK-OsNJk0

The coded language of "causing division" is a complete red herring.

Latinos support populism and socialism

thats the problem of LatAm

Yes, so if they are united behind that, does it make it good?

and why i hate this continent so much

They want messiahs that fix they world for them

that give them free shit

Yes.

But due to this rise in leftist ideology has given rise to the division between socialists and non-socialists.

And you can "unite" a lot of people behind that. Jesus Christ, if that is what people were uniting behind, you better HOPE there is some division left.

Jesus Christ.

Division is necesary for the debate of ideas