Message from @Gilgamesh
Discord ID: 544402220838420491
Jock why do you use so many periods
He's on his period.
💀*clicks tongue* oof lemme run this through and check the accuracy. This could be a spicy thing to archive and save.
i just got the impression that the company basicilly squinted and thought it kinda looked like code similar to another group that they named themselves and presumed to be russians because of other vague suspicions
Yes.
They tried to blame jeff bezos phone being hacked on Trump. These people are just trolling now lol
Fuck them
People who want the truth don't use tactics like those.
see what I wanna know is why did Julian Assange blast 9/11 truthers
They would be eager to share data that would strengthen their case.
if Wikileaks is a Russian agency
Idk how this is going to end but i dont think we can go back to pre 2015
we know to much about the deep state
CrowdStrike was the name of the company. I find zerohedge to be a very reliable source. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-28/something-stinks-here-crowdstrike-revises-retracts-parts-explosive-russian-hacking-r
because assange just believes what he believes and mocks people who reach different conclusions
he did leak the 9/11 pager messages which included that whole "angel is next" thing; evidence that there was a threat on air force one
idk man I just think it's clear that it wasn't like they said
@Crimsom That should get you going.
Assange is like some super hacker inside knowledge guy and is like "lol if you think 9/11 was anything but the official story you're fucked"
Does anyone doubt 9/11
?
yeah I do
Evidence is their
What
lol
You kdding
are you fucked
Doubt is easy
there's dozens of things to doubt
@CasualSailor saving all of these. Will be utilizing them in a paper hopefully.
Even if someone had hacked the DNC, does anybody even question if that is election meddling?
I'm not doubting that 9/11 happened, I'm doubting what the official story is
Somehow the fucking majority of the plane is vaporized but the passports are perfectly in tact?
That's the most damning evidence
So Fuck off
Did it change the outcome of the vote? If it did, should it have? If facts have been exposed that made the DNC look bad, especially if coming from their own servers, would it not have been proper for the public to have a bad opinion based on it?
this is why I hate people blatantly against any openminded critical thinking
How is that "election hacking"?
meanwhile both sides of the left and right openly engage in conspiracy theory
without calling it that