The ones engaged in pursuing it officially know this.

hard to say, mockingbird

They wouldn't use such carefully crafted language otherwise.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-fbi-had-private-company-examine-dncs-hacked-servers

And there are acts that are deliberate, such as editing of the report that was just mentioned.

nice

People who want the truth don't try to silence other sources like WikiLeaks.

THe hypocrisy of the left..............Their is no evidence of Russia hacking the DNC.....................and even if they interfered, all they did was show information to people......................................and even then, we do it to all other countries.............................and even then, Hillary has colluded with Russia way more............................................and even then, aipac and mexico influence our election much more

People who want the truth would argue against it.

They know they are having the weaker ground with their argument. They are using tactics that bullshitters use.

Jock why do you use so many periods

He's on his period.

💀*clicks tongue* oof lemme run this through and check the accuracy. This could be a spicy thing to archive and save.

i just got the impression that the company basicilly squinted and thought it kinda looked like code similar to another group that they named themselves and presumed to be russians because of other vague suspicions

https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html

Yes.

They tried to blame jeff bezos phone being hacked on Trump. These people are just trolling now lol

Fuck them

People who want the truth don't use tactics like those.

see what I wanna know is why did Julian Assange blast 9/11 truthers

They would be eager to share data that would strengthen their case.

if Wikileaks is a Russian agency

Idk how this is going to end but i dont think we can go back to pre 2015

we know to much about the deep state

CrowdStrike was the name of the company. I find zerohedge to be a very reliable source. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-28/something-stinks-here-crowdstrike-revises-retracts-parts-explosive-russian-hacking-r

because assange just believes what he believes and mocks people who reach different conclusions
he did leak the 9/11 pager messages which included that whole "angel is next" thing; evidence that there was a threat on air force one

idk man I just think it's clear that it wasn't like they said

@Crimsom That should get you going.

Assange is like some super hacker inside knowledge guy and is like "lol if you think 9/11 was anything but the official story you're fucked"

Does anyone doubt 9/11

:/

?

yeah I do

Evidence is their

What

lol

You kdding

are you fucked

Doubt is easy

there's dozens of things to doubt

@CasualSailor saving all of these. Will be utilizing them in a paper hopefully.